摘要
本文指出在我国的条约实践中,条约实际上是被区分为自执行的条约和非自执行的条约两类。自执行的条约又因为被限制在涉外法律关系的范围之内,只适用于涉外法律关系的当事人之间而不适用于我国的诉讼当事人,且只能被认为是一种有限范围内的直接适用。另一方面,本文还探讨了条约在我国国内法中的地位问题,提出了条约在我国国内法中的地位是与国内法相等的而不是像我国一些学者所主张的条约优越于我国国内法的观点。
The article demonstrates that treaties have been divided into self-execut- ing treaties and non-self-executing treaties in the legal system of China in practice.It re- veals that only foreign legal person or natural person can bring an action or proceedings of any kind to enforce or determine any right or obligation arising under the provisions of self-executing treaties,domestic legal person or natural person can not revoke any provision of this kind of treaty if all the parties concerned are Chinese people.There- fore,the self-executing treaties in the domestic legal system can only be implemented in a limited scope.Moreover,based on the above analysis,this article concludes that treaties have equal status to municipal law in Chinas legal system.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2004年第1期113-134,共22页
Wuhan University International Law Review
