期刊文献+

论侵权行为自体法的发展 被引量:4

On Development of the Proper Law of a Tort
下载PDF
导出
摘要 侵权行为自体法理论是法律适用规则从僵化走向灵活的表现之一。该理论要求适用法律时必须给予多元化之考虑,它的第一要义应是灵活性和为案件选择最为适当的法律。最密切联系的方法则是满足这种追求的最为重要的方法之一,但侵权行为法律适用中灵活性的趋势与个案结果合理性的诉求,都在要求它自身不断发展。晚近,传统侵权法律适用理论排斥当事人意思自治原则的各种原因已然不再牢不可破,意思自治原则得到越来越多国家的认可和规定。在中国的司法实践中,该原则也得到了广泛的适用。侵权行为自体法作为一个概念,从其本意而言,只要能够选出侵权行为案件最为适当的法律,就可以纳入这一概念的范畴,当事人意思自治原则也不例外。 The doctrine of the proper law of the tort is a sign that the application of the law rules change from rigidity to flexibility.The doctrine requires multi-dimensional and comprehensive considerations when applying relevant laws.The primary meaning of this theory should be flexible application of law and the most proper law be chosen.The method of most significant relationship is the most important method to fulfill this objective.However,both the trend of flexibility and the rationality of individual case require the proper law of the tort further develop.Recently,the reasons which the traditional theory excludes the principle of party autonomy are no longer unbreakable.The principle of party autonomy has been stipulated in many countries' legislation.In Chinese judicial practice,it has also been applied in many cases.The principle of party autonomy should become a part of the proper law of the tort.
作者 何其生 卢熙
出处 《武大国际法评论》 CSSCI 2010年第S1期140-170,共31页 Wuhan University International Law Review
基金 何其生教授主持的司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"外国法适用的实践困境与理论选择"(项目编号:07SFB3030)的成果之一
关键词 侵权行为自体法 最密切联系原则 当事人意思自治 The proper law of the tort The most significant relationship The principle of party autonomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献12

  • 1邹国勇.论欧洲联盟国际私法的统一化[J].法学评论,2007,25(1):85-90. 被引量:15
  • 2[1]Parlement Européen et Conseil de l'Union Européenne.Règlement (CE) n° 864/2007 du 11 juillet 2007 sur la Loi Applicable anx Obligations non Contractuelles ("Rome Ⅱ ")[Z].Journal Officiel de l'Union Européenne,2007,(L 7.31).
  • 3[4]Council of European Union.Draft Program of Measures for Implementation of the Principle of Mutual Recognition of Decisions in Civil and Commercial Matters[R].Official Journal of European Union,2001,(C 1.15).
  • 4[5]Conseil de L'Europe.Le Programme de La Haye:Renforcer la Liberté,la Sécurité et la Justice dans l'Union Européenne[R].Journal Officiel de l'Union Européenne,2005,(C 3.3).
  • 5[6]Kurt H.Nadelmann.Impressionism and Unification of Law:The EEC Draft Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations[J].American Journal of Comparative Law,1976,(1).
  • 6[7]Patrick Ross Williams.The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations[J].International and Comparative Law Quarterly,1986,(1).
  • 7[8]Editorial Comments.On a Way to a Rome I Regulation[J].Common Market Law Review,2006,(4).
  • 8[9]J.J.Fawcett.Policy Considerations in Tort Choice of Law[J].Modem Law Review,1984 (6).
  • 9[10]Symeon C.Symeonides.Louisiana's New Law of Choice of Law for Tort Conflicts:An Exegesis[J].Tulane Law Review,1992,(4).
  • 10[11]D.Kokkini-Iatridou.Les Clauses d'Exception en Matière de Conflits de Lois ct de Conflits de Juridictions---ou le Prineipe de Proximité,XVIe Congrès International de Droit Comparé[M].Dordreeht/Boston/London:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,1994.

共引文献29

同被引文献15

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部