分离与互动:家事纠纷诉调对接机制之完善

Separation and Interaction: Perfecting the Connection Mechanismof Litigation with Mediation in Family Disputes

在'大民法'观念的影响下,家事案件适用一般民事诉讼程序,无法满足家事纠纷及其化解程序的特殊性要求。各地法院积极探索家事纠纷联调机制,动员社会力量参与纠纷化解工作。但是,由于在实践中社会资源协同配合不足,而且法官承受着调解率和办案任务的双重压力,难免出现调解法官和审判法官的一体现象,导致法院调解面临'合意贫困化'、'调解强制化'的实践困境。本文将比较分析日本、澳大利亚家事纠纷化解制度,总结家事纠纷调解机制的本土经验,整合互补资源,'有限地分离'法院调解和诉讼程序,以完善家事纠纷诉调对接机制。

Being under the influence of the concept of Broad Civil Law,the family disputes with other civil disputes are incorporated into the normal proceeding,which doesn’t meet the practical requirement of the resolving family disputes.The local courts explore i joint mediation mechanism of family disputes to mobilize public communities.However,the communities play poorly together in judicial practice.Moreover,the judges undertake both A.trial and mediation,which lead to lacking of consensus in mediation.Basing on comparative analysis the practice of Japanese and Australia system to solve family disputes,the practitioners should limited separate the proceedings of litigation and mediation.