从hiQv.LinkedIn案和新浪脉脉案的比较分析,看中美两国数据管理的差异

Comparative analysis of differences between China and the United States data management from hiQ v. Linked In and Sina v.Maimai case

2017年8月,针对hiQ公司(hiQ Labs)起诉LinkedIn公司不正当竞争的案件,美国联邦地方法院发出了临时禁令,裁定LinkedIn停止不正当竞争行为,并不得再阻止hiQ使用其平台上已经公开的数据。而之前,北京知识产权法院对新浪脉脉一案的判决却采取了不同的态度,禁止脉脉继续抓取微博平台的用户数据。

In August 2017, hiQ Labs sued LinkedIn for unfair competition. The United States District Court issued a temporary injunction ordering LinkedIn to stop unfair competition and no longer prevented hiQ from using public data on its platform. Prior to this, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court took a different attitude toward the judgment of Sina v.Maimai and banned the users from continuing to crawl the Weibo platform. There are inconsistencies in the rules governing the use of data between China and the United States, and the types of data involved in the two cases are different.Relevant government departments and enterprises in our country can learn from this, and on the premise of safeguarding information security and protecting personal information, public, non-personal data for fair use.