摘要
目的对比胰岛素泵、静脉结合肌注胰岛素疗效与并发症发生情况。方法 2015年4月—2016年11月,黑箱摸球法,A组、B组各入组40例。A组胰岛素泵用药,B组静注、肌注。对比2周后疗效与胰岛素用量,6个月后血糖控制率、并发症。结果 A组2例置入失败,A组2周后FBG、达标所需天数、2周胰岛素用量、高低血糖率、皮下硬结率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胰岛素泵血糖控制效果更理想,可降低并发症发生风险。
Objective to compare the combination of intravenous injection of insulin pump,insulin efficacy and complications. Methods from April 2015 to 2016 November,the black box and touch the ball,A group,B group,A group enrolled 40 cases of insulin pump treatment,group B intravenous injection,Contrast treatment and insulin dosage,blood glucose control rate,in after 2 weeks,and complications after 6 months. Results a group of 2 cases of implant failure,A group FBG after 2 weeks,the standard number of days required for 2 weeks,the dosage of insulin,blood glucose level,subcutaneous induration was lower than that in B group,there was significant difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion the effect of blood glucose control by insulin pump is more ideal,which can reduce the risk of complications in patients with
出处
《大医生》
2017年第3期13-14,共2页
Doctor
关键词
糖尿病
胰岛素泵
临床疗效
Diabetes mellitus
insulin pump
clinical efficacy
