摘要
目的对不同延续性护理方式对脊髓损伤患者生存质量以及康复的影响进行分析和讨论。方法选取我院2016年6月—2017年5月接收的脊髓损伤患者62例为研究对象,比较两组患者生存质量和并发症发生状况。结果在生存质量、功能独立性评分以及社会交往方面,研究组要比对照组低出许多,差异显著,统计学存在意义(P<0.05)。结论家庭访视的延续性护理效果要比电话随访延续性护理效果好。
Objective The effects of different continuous nursing methods on the quality of life and rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury were analyzed and discussed. Methods 62 cases of spinal cord injury received by our hospital in May-2017 June 2016 were selected as the subjects. The quality of life and the occurrence of complications in the two groups were compared. Results In terms of quality of life,functional independence score and social interaction,the study group was much lower than the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of continuing care in family visits is better than that of continuing care in telephone follow-up.
出处
《大医生》
2017年第8期140-141,共2页
Doctor
关键词
脊髓损伤
康复
生存质量
延续性护理
spinal cord injury
recovery
quality of life
continuous nursing