难治性妇产科大出血的临床治疗

Clinical Treatment of Carprost Tromethamine Injection

目的探讨难治性妇产科大出血的临床治疗。方法选取2016年4月—2017年4月在本院进行妇产科大出血临床治疗的患者60例,分为A组和B组,各30例。A组患者采用欣母沛治疗,B组采用子宫动脉结扎术治疗,对不同止血方案下两组患者的临床疗效进行分析对比。结果 A组患者手术时间为(40.4±8.3)min,术中出血量为(965.5±123.7)m L,术后阴道流血时间为(10.15±2.2)d;B组患者手术时间为(68.7±10.3)min,术中出血量为(1523.5±276.4)m L,术后阴道流血时间为(16.5±4.1)d。两组实验结果比较差异明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论欣母沛治疗难治性妇产科大出血临床疗效优于手术治疗。

Objective To investigate the clinical situation of intractable gynaecological haemorrhage. MethodsA total of 60 patients with gynaecology and obstetrics hemorrhage were selected from April 2016 to April 2017 and divided into group A and B,each 30 cases. The patients in group A were treated with Carprost tromethamine injection,and the patients in group B were treated with uterine artery ligation. The clinical effects of two groups of patients under different hemostasis were analyzed and compared. Results A group of patients operation time was(40.4±8.3)min,the amount of hemorrhage of(965.5±123.7)mL,postoperative vaginal bleeding time was(10.15±2.2)d;B group operation time was(68.7±10.3)min,the amount of hemorrhage of(1523.5±276.4)mL operation after the time of vaginal bleeding is(16.5±4.1)d. The results of the two groups were significantly different,with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical treatment of carprost tromethamine injection has prominent curative effect.