摘要
目的探讨急性肾损伤不同诊断标准在危重症患者中的诊断意义。方法回顾性分析本院收治的726名急性肾损伤患者,比较RIFLE、KDIGO、AKIN三种诊断标准的应用价值。结果 AKI诊断敏感性方面,KDIGO标准敏感性最强,RIFLE标准敏感性次之,AKIN标准敏感性最差(P<0.05)。结论 KDIGO危重症急性肾损伤患者的诊断中灵敏度最高,可以在临床上作为优先选用标准。
Objective To explore the diagnostic significance of different diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Methods A total of 726 critically ill patients in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The application value of three diagnostic criteria of RIFLE,KDIGO and AKIN was compared. Results In the AKI diagnostic sensitivity,the KDIGO standard was the most sensitive,the RIFLE standard sensitivity was the second,and the AKIN standard was the worst(P<0.05). Conclusion KDIGO has the highest sensitivity in the diagnosis of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and can be used as a priority standard in clinical practice.
出处
《大医生》
2017年第10期112-112,123,共2页
Doctor
关键词
急性肾损伤
危重症
诊断标准
acute kidney injury
critically ill
diagnostic criteria
