摘要
目的对比子宫切除患者应用开腹及腹腔镜切除术的效果。方法选取本院收治的120例子宫切除患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组采用开腹全子宫切除术治疗,观察组采用腹腔镜下全子宫切除术治疗,比较两组患者临床疗效。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率、切口甲级愈合率、镇痛药物使用率均显著优于对照组(P <0.05)。结?论??在临床手术治疗中,腹腔镜下全子宫切除术治疗子宫疾病更优于传统开腹子宫切除术治疗,有良好的临床应用价值。
Objective To compare the effect of laparotomy and laparoscopy in hysterectomy patients. Methods A total of 120 patients who needed hysterectomy were divided into control group and observation group,60 cases in each group. The control group was treated with open total hysterectomy and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic total hysterectomy. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared. Results The operation time,the amount of bleeding,the incidence of complications,the rate of wound healing and the use rate of analgesic drugs in the control group were significantly worse than those in the observation group(P<0.05). Conclusion In the clinical operation,laparoscopic hysterectomy is better than the traditional open hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine diseases. It has good clinical value.
出处
《大医生》
2018年第9期26-27,共2页
Doctor