期刊文献+

莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗下呼吸道感染的临床对比 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in Treatment of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗下呼吸道感染的临床疗效。方法选取2017年1月至12月本院收治的76例下呼吸道感染患者,按照治疗方式不同分为左氧氟沙星组(38例)和莫西沙星(38例),分别予以左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星治疗,比较两组患者临床疗效、不良反应和治疗成本效果。结果莫西沙星组临床治疗总有效率为94.7%,显著高于左氧氟沙星组(78.9%,P<0.05);莫西沙星组患者发热消失时间、喘息消失时间和咳嗽消失时间均明显少于左氧氟沙星组(P<0.05);莫西沙星组患者成本效果明显低于左氧氟沙星组;两组患者均未见严重不良反应发生。结论左氧氟沙星与莫西沙星均能有效治疗下呼吸道感染疾病,莫西沙星能快速改善患者临床症状,左氧氟沙星组患者成本效果好于莫西沙星组。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and cost of mosifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Methods Seventy-six patients with lower respiratory tract infection in our hospital from January to December 2017 were divided into levofloxacin group(38 cases)and mosifloxacin group(38 cases)according to different treatment Methods. The clinical efficacy,side effects and treatment cost of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the mosifloxacin group was 94.7%,significantly higher than that of levofloxacin group(78.9%,P<0.05). The disappearance time of fever,gasp and cough in the moxifloxacin group were significantly less than those in the levofloxacin group(P<0.05). The cost effect of the moxifloxacin group was significantly lower than that of the levofloxacin group. There were no serious adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin are effective in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Moxifloxacin could rapidly improve the clinical symptoms of patients;while the cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin is better than that of moxifloxacin.
作者 郁云
出处 《大医生》 2018年第Z1期132-133,共2页 Doctor
关键词 左氧氟沙星 莫西沙星 下呼吸道感染 临床效果 levofloxacin moxifloxacin lower respiratory tract infection clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1李莉,陈晨,曾武章.莫西沙星治疗老年社区获得性肺炎的疗效及相关因素分析[J].中国生化药物杂志,2014,34(1):127-129. 被引量:32
  • 2孔晓东.药物经济学:概念、方法和应用[J].国外医学(药学分册),1994,21(1):13-18. 被引量:429
  • 3王艳,赵玉杰.药物经济学与促进合理用药[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2005,7(9):8-9. 被引量:6
  • 4Keith PK.Clinical impact of antibiotic resistance in respiratory tractinfections[J].Int J Antimicro Agents,2007,29(Supp 1):6.
  • 5Norrby SR,Petermann W,Willcox PA,et al.A comparative studyof levofloxacin and ceftriaxone in the treatment of hospitalized pa-tients with pneumonia[J].Scand Infect Dis,1998,30(4):397-405.
  • 6Lopez H,Vilches V,Scarano S,et al.Multicentre study of the invitro evaluation of moxifloxacin and other quinolones against commu-nity acquired respiratory pathogens[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2001,18(4):379-382.
  • 7Ball P.Future of the quindones[J].Semin Respir Infect,2001,16(3):215-218.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.新药(西药)临床研究指导原则[S].1993:49-50.
  • 9Gilho,Lee.Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis Strains Isolated From Male Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection. Korean journal of urology . 2013
  • 10曾春芳.莫西沙星治疗下呼吸道感染临床疗效观察[J].中华全科医学,2012,10(1):36-37. 被引量:12

共引文献34

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部