期刊文献+

低分子肝素在治疗新生儿败血症的疗效评估 被引量:1

Evaluation of Effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Treatment of Neonatal Septicemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨低分子肝素治疗新生儿败血症的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取本院收治的20例新生儿败血症的患儿,均在常规基础上给予低分子肝素治疗,观察其疗效、炎性及肝肾功能指标变化情况,统计并发症发生率。结果 20例患儿的治疗总有效率为80%,治疗后患儿白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)水平均较治疗前显著下降(P <0.05),谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、血肌酐(Cr)治疗前后差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。治疗过程中无严重并发症,未见患儿死亡。结论低分子肝素治疗新生儿败血症能提高疗效,有效控制感染,对患儿肝肾功能无明显影响,安全性较高。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin(LMWH)in the treatment of neonatal septicemia.Methods Twenty cases of neonatal septicemia in our hospital were treated with low molecular weight heparin(LMWH)on the basis of routine treatment.The curative effect,the changes of inflammatory and hepatic and renal function indexes and the incidence of complications were observed.Results The total effective rate of 20 cases was 80%.After treatment,the level of(WBC),C reactive protein(CRP),procalcitonin(PCT)in leukocyte count was significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05),and the level of(ALT),was significantly lower than that before treatment(P<0.05).Difference of serum creatinine(Cr)before and after treatment There was no significant difference(P>0.05).There were no serious complications and no death.Conclusion Low molecular weight heparin treatment of neonatal septicemia can improve the curative effect,control infection effectively,have no obvious influence on the liver and kidney function of children,and have high safety.
作者 唐平乐 TANG Pingle(Guangxi Dahua Yao Autonomous County Maternal and Child Health Hospital Pediatrics,Dahua,Guangxi 530800,China)
出处 《大医生》 2019年第2期118-119,共2页 Doctor
关键词 低分子肝素 新生儿败血症 疗效 安全性 low molecular weight heparin neonatal septicemia efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

  • 1卫生部抗生素临床药理基地.抗菌药物临床研究指导原则.中国临床药理学杂志,1987,2:189-191.
  • 2邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:395-398.
  • 3Kocher S, Muller W, Resch B. Linezolid treatment of nosocomial bacterial infection with multiresistant Gram-positive pathogens in preterm infants: a systematic review[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2010, 36(2): 106-110.
  • 4Welsh KJ, Abbott AN, Lewis EM. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and microbiologic features associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in pediatric patients treated with vancomycin[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48(3) : 894-899.
  • 5Garazzino S, Tovo PA. Clinical experience with linezolid in infants and children [J]. J Antinicrob Chemother, 2011, 66 (S4): 23-41.
  • 6Deville JG, Adler S, Azimi PH, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of known or suspected resistant Grampositive infections in neonates[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2003, 22(9): S158-S163.
  • 7Boselli EP. Pharmacokinetics and intrapulmonary concentrations of linezolid administered to critically ill patients with ventilator associated pneumonia[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(7) : 1529- 1534.
  • 8Dryden MS. Linezolid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical treatment[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2011, 66 (Suppl 4): iv7-iv15.
  • 9Langgartner M, Mutenthaler A, Haiden N, et al. Linezolid for treatment of catheter-related cerebrospinal fluid infections in preterm infants[J]. BMJ Case Rep, 2009, 11(5): 1217.
  • 10Falagas ME, Siempos II, Vardakas KZ. Linezolid versus glycopeptides or beta-lactam for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2008, 8 (1) : 53-66.

共引文献1063

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部