摘要
A method for determining medium quality factor is developed on the basis of analyzing the attenuation dispersion of the arrived first period P wave. In order to enhance signal to noise ratio, improve the resolution in measurement and reduce systematic error we applied the data resampling technique. The group velocity delay of P wave was derived by using an improved multi-filtering method. Based on a linear viscoelastic relaxation model we deduced the medium quality factor Qm, and associated error with 95% confidence level. Applying the method to the seismic record of the Xiuyan M=5.4 earthquake sequences we obtained the following result: 1 High Qm started to appear from Nov. 9, 1999. The events giving the deduced high Qm value clustered in a region with their epicenter dis- tances being between 32 and 46 km to the Yingkou station. This Qm versus distance observation obviously deviates from the normal trend of Qm linearly increasing with distance. 2 The average Qm before the 29 Dec. 1999 M=5.4 earthquake is 460, while the average Qm between the M=5.4 event and the 12 Jan. 2000 M=5.1 earthquake is 391, and the average Qm after the M=5.1 event is 204.
A method for determining medium quality factor is developed on the basis of analyzing the attenuation dispersion of the arrived first period P wave. In order to enhance signal to noise ratio, improve the resolution in measurement and reduce systematic error we applied the data resampling technique. The group velocity delay of P wave was derived by using an improved multi-filtering method. Based on a linear viscoelastic relaxation model we deduced the medium quality factor Qm, and associated error with 95% confidence level. Applying the method to the seismic record of the Xiuyan M=5.4 earthquake sequences we obtained the following result: 1 High Qm started to appear from Nov. 9, 1999. The events giving the deduced high Qm value clustered in a region with their epicenter dis- tances being between 32 and 46 km to the Yingkou station. This Qm versus distance observation obviously deviates from the normal trend of Qm linearly increasing with distance. 2 The average Qm before the 29 Dec. 1999 M=5.4 earthquake is 460, while the average Qm between the M=5.4 event and the 12 Jan. 2000 M=5.1 earthquake is 391, and the average Qm after the M=5.1 event is 204.
基金
State Key Project of Science and Technology during the Tenth Five-year Plan (2004BA601B01-03-01).
