期刊文献+

解读“丑陋”的设计

Interpretation of the “Ugly” Design
原文传递
导出
摘要 2012年伦敦奥运会标志的推出引发了学术界对"丑陋"设计的争议。批评者认为"丑陋"的设计空洞、肤浅、无聊;支持者认为"丑陋"的设计展现了真实的自己。文章指出"丑陋"的设计是现代人回归自然的心理需求,是后现代主义向传统审美的挑战,是注意力经济下商业竞争的策略手段。作为时代语言表达的方式之一,"丑陋"的设计代表了人们感性需求的多元化发展方向,我们无需过多限制,应该打开通道让其尽情发挥。 The logo of 2012 London Olympics has aroused the academic disputes on the 'ugly' design. The critics think that the 'ugly' design is empty, superficial and boring design, on the contrary, the supporters believe that it shows a true self. In this article, the 'ugly' design is considered to be the psychological demand of modern people returning to the nature, the postmodernism challenge to the traditional aesthetic standard, and the strategies of commercial competition in the attention economy. As one of the expression ways of the age’s language, the 'ugly' design represents the direction of diversification development of people’s perceptual demand. Therefore, it does not need to be restricted excessively, on the contrary, it should be well developed with a suitable environment.
作者 王轩
出处 《艺术与设计(理论版)》 2012年第A03期45-47,共3页 Art and Design
基金 2010年度国家社会科学基金项目资助 项目名称为"当代电子媒介的审美文化逻辑研究" 项目编号:10CZW010
关键词 丑陋的设计 现代主义 后现代主义 注意力经济 'Ugly' Design, Modernism, Post Modernism, Attention Economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献5

  • 1[2]Ronald Paulson.The Beautiful,Novel,and Strange:Aesthetics and Heterodoxy[M].Johns Hopkins University Press,1996.
  • 2[5]Dale Keiger.A Scholar's Progress[J].Johns Hopkins Magazine,November 2000,http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/1100web.
  • 3[7]Therese Dolan.The Beautiful,Novel,and Strange:Aesthetics and Heterodoxy-Review[J].The Art Bulletin,March 1998,http://www.findarticles.com.
  • 4[英]李斯托威尔(Listowel) 著,蒋孔阳.近代美学史评述[M]上海译文出版社,1980.
  • 5(德)莱辛著,朱光潜.拉奥孔[M]人民文学出版社,1979.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部