摘要
仲裁裁决的撤销与不予执行制度是法院对仲裁进行司法监督的重要方式。本文在探究该制度在我国的来源、仲裁制度的价值以及对各国仲裁监督制度进行比较后认为,新修订的《仲裁法》不应再拘泥于1991年修订的《民事诉讼法》的规定,特别是“双轨制”和实体审查的规定,在平衡公正与效率两个原则的前提下,顺应国际立法潮流,实行仅对仲裁裁决的程序事项进行司法审查的制度,在撤销和不予执行仲裁裁决制度上实行“单轨制”,本文在文末进一步提出了具体的修改意见。
Judicial supervision plays important role in the proceedings of challenging and recognition and enforcement of arbitral award. After study of history of said kind of supervision in China, value of arbitration, arbitration laws in other countries, this article is going to draw the following conclusion: the new arbitration law, if any should not follow the legislative style, especially of the “double-track” supervision and substantive supervision. Considering balance of justice and efficiency and following the legislation trend of international society, the new arbitration law should set up the system with supervision only over procedural matters, with “one tract” supervision in the proceeding of challenging, recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award. Last part of this article gives suggestion in how to modify the existing arbitration law.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2006年第2期6-17,共12页
Arbitration Study
关键词
仲裁裁决
不予执行
撤销
Arbitral Award, Challenging the Arbitral Award, Recognition and Enforcement of the Arbitral Award