摘要
在仲裁司法监督范围这一问题上,理论界一向有争议。通过对东莞市中级人民法院一起裁定驳回申请撤销仲裁裁决案例的分析,可以看出,司法实践中,已经将程序问题作为司法对仲裁的主要监督范围,将司法审查范围限于程序性审查有助于保障仲裁的独立性和自治性。因此,删除现行法律关于仲裁实体审查的规定,既符合国际惯例,也有助于促进我国仲裁事业的发展。
There have always been disputes on the range of judicial review in theory.It is seen from the analysis of a verdict made by the Dong Guan intermediate people's courts that peocedure review has been considered as the main range of judicial review.Restrict the scope of judicial review to peocedure review helps to foster the independence and autonomy of arbitration.Therefore,the deletion of the existing regulations on the fact review is in line with international practice,it will also help to promote the development of arbitration.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2007年第2期92-98,共7页
Arbitration Study
关键词
仲裁
司法监督
监督范围
实体审查
程序审查
Arbitration
Judicial Review
Range of Review
Fact Review
Procedure Review