期刊文献+

从一起撤销仲裁裁决案看我国司法监督的范围 被引量:4

On the Range of Judicial Review to Arbitration:From the Respect of A Recocative Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 在仲裁司法监督范围这一问题上,理论界一向有争议。通过对东莞市中级人民法院一起裁定驳回申请撤销仲裁裁决案例的分析,可以看出,司法实践中,已经将程序问题作为司法对仲裁的主要监督范围,将司法审查范围限于程序性审查有助于保障仲裁的独立性和自治性。因此,删除现行法律关于仲裁实体审查的规定,既符合国际惯例,也有助于促进我国仲裁事业的发展。 There have always been disputes on the range of judicial review in theory.It is seen from the analysis of a verdict made by the Dong Guan intermediate people's courts that peocedure review has been considered as the main range of judicial review.Restrict the scope of judicial review to peocedure review helps to foster the independence and autonomy of arbitration.Therefore,the deletion of the existing regulations on the fact review is in line with international practice,it will also help to promote the development of arbitration.
作者 王小莉
机构地区 广州仲裁委员会
出处 《仲裁研究》 2007年第2期92-98,共7页 Arbitration Study
关键词 仲裁 司法监督 监督范围 实体审查 程序审查 Arbitration Judicial Review Range of Review Fact Review Procedure Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1消费者主权:从冬天到春天的时代距离——评恒生案,兼论法的精神[J].互联网周刊,2000(1):8-9. 被引量:67
  • 2郭玉军.国际商事仲裁中的友好仲裁问题[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),1999,53(6):10-14. 被引量:14
  • 3[9][美]Stephen K. Huber、E. Wendy Trachte - Huber .Arbitration: cases and materials[M]. Cincinnati, Ohio:Anderson Publishing Co., c1998.
  • 4[10]Van den Berg. the New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation[M].The Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers. 1981.
  • 5[11]最高人法院.人民法院案例选[M].北京:人民法院出版社,1994.
  • 6[16]See Clive M. Schmitthhoff, Finality of Arbitral Awards and Judicial Review, Edited by Chia - jui Cheng, Clive M. Schmitthoff's Select Essays on international Trade Law, P655-657, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 1988.
  • 7[18]See Clive M. Schmitthhoff, Abitration: the Supervisory Jurisdiction of the Courts, Edited by Chia - jui Cheng, Clive M.Schmitthoff's Select Essays on international Trade Law, P599- 602, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 1988.
  • 8[19]In Perini Corporation v. Great Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.,610 A.2d 364(N.J. 1992)
  • 9[20]See Advest, Inc. v. McCarty, 914 F. 2d 6( 1 st Cir.1990).
  • 10[22]See Parsons & Whitemore Overseas Co. v. RAKTA, 508F. 2d 969.

同被引文献16

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部