摘要
一般认为仲裁裁决具有和法院判决同等的效力,在解决社会纠纷和确定权利义务关系中发挥了相当于司法裁判的作用。但仲裁所具有的民间性特征以及其特殊的审理过程,使其裁决之效力不可能完全等同于法院判决。对仲裁裁决主文之既判力,学界和实务界多持肯定意见。但是对于仲裁裁决理由,则不能简单肯定其完全的拘束力。仲裁裁决争点效与仲裁制度的一些基本特征存在不兼容之处,甚至有侵害仲裁公正之可能。因此,不应承认在仲裁裁决理由之上,有类似既判力的争点效力。
It is believed that the arbitrament has the same effect as the judgment and the arbitration has the similar effect as judge in the resolving disputation.But the effects of arbitrament and judgment can not be the same because of the basic nature of arbitration—non-government and special arbitration procedure.The Res Judicata of the main content of arbitrament is popularly confirmed to.But whether the reason of arbitrament has the same effect is doubtful.The effect of the reason of arbitrament is not compatible to the nature of arbitration.What's more,the effect of the reason may damage the justice of arbitration.SoⅠthink the reason of arbitrament should not have Res Judicata or the similar binding effect.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2008年第3期12-20,共9页
Arbitration Study
关键词
仲裁裁决
仲裁裁决理由
争点效
arbitrament
the reason of arbitrament
the effect of the reason