期刊文献+

非内国仲裁理论对仲裁地选择的影响研究 被引量:1

A Study On Influence of"Non-domestic Arbitration Theory"to the International Commercial Arbitration Place Choice Principle
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着国际商事仲裁的发展,仲裁的"非内国化"问题受到了广泛的关注。文章从非内国化仲裁的理论与实践评析着手,对非内国仲裁理论能否适用于我国商事仲裁实践从学理、立法上进行了分析,提出仲裁地国法律对仲裁程序的选择和仲裁效力、执行等提供了充分的理论支持,因此意思自治原则不能否定属地原则在我国国际商事仲裁中的运用。非内国仲裁裁决标准和《纽约公约》对于我国仲裁裁决的承认和执行不宜施加过于显著的影响。 Due to the development of international commercial arbitration,'Non-domestic Arbitration Theory'is drawing wide-range attention.The paper begins with the theory and practice of delocalization,and analyzes the reasons why delocalization couldn' t apply to the commercial arbitration in China.Because the localization arbitration law has brought enough support to the international commercial arbitral procedure and so on,the principle of party autonomy shouldn' t replace the traditional view of'arbitration governed by lex arbitri'localization theory in international commercial arbitration.Therefore,'delocalization'couldn't exert too much influence to the international commercial arbitration practice.
作者 张娅娅
出处 《仲裁研究》 2008年第4期29-36,共8页 Arbitration Study
关键词 国际商事仲裁 非内国裁决 仲裁地属地原则 International Commercial Arbitration Non-domestic Arbitration Theory Localization Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1韩健.也论国际商会仲裁院能否在中国内地进行仲裁——兼评中国内地《仲裁法》中的几个问题[J].仲裁与法律,2004(95):43-52. 被引量:1
  • 2Jan Paulson, Arbitration Unbound: Award Detached from the Law of Its Country of Origin, 30 International & Comp. L.Q. 358, 1981, Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why It Matters, 32 International & Comp. L.Q. 53, 1983.
  • 3Hans Smit, A-National Arbitration, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 63, 1989. p.631.
  • 4W. Laurence Craig, Some Trends and Developments in the Laws and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 30 Texas International Law Journal, Winter, 1995, p.24.
  • 5赵秀文.“论非内国仲裁”[A]..《国际经济法论丛(第6卷)》[C].,2002年.第546页.第559页.
  • 6黄亚英.论《纽约公约》与外国仲裁裁决的承认和执行[N].人民法院报,2003-10-17("学者论坛"版).
  • 7Gerald Aksen and Wendy S.Dorman,Application of the New York Convention by United States Courts:A Twenty-Years Review[J].2 The American Review of International Arbitration1991:68-69.
  • 8International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA).Yearbook Commercial Arbitration ⅩⅪ[R].1996:401.
  • 9ICCA,Yearbook Commercial Arbitration ⅩⅩ[R].1995:762-763.
  • 10万鄂湘.涉外商事海事审判指导:2004年第3辑[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2005:59-65.

共引文献29

引证文献1

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部