仲裁调解书有关法律问题辨析

On the Legal Issue of Arbitration Conciliation Statement

仲裁调解制度是我国仲裁制度的重要组成部分,根据调解协议作成的调解书与裁决书具有同等的法律效力,是我国仲裁独有的一项制度,实践中,有相当一部分案件是通过调解结案的,但客观上,仲裁调解书与仲裁裁决书并不完全相同,我国《仲裁法》对有关仲裁调解书的规定也不全面,这就导致了人们对仲裁调解书的认识存在着差异。本文即尝试从仲裁调解书的内容要求、对涉及第三人权益的调解协议能否确认为仲裁调解书、对超出仲裁请求达成的调解协议能否确认为仲裁调解书、仲裁调解书能否撤销与不予执行等角度对与仲裁调解书有关的法律问题作一剖析。

Conciliation during the process of the arbitration is an important part of arbitration system of China,and it is unique legislation.According to Arbitration Law of China,a conciliation statement and an arbitration award have equal legal effect.But in practice it is not always the same.And there is different understanding of the conciliation statement due to legislation defects.This article discusses about the following questions:the content requirement of conciliation;whether a conciliation agreement can be confirmed if it relates to the third party;whether a conciliation agreement can be confirmed if it is not exactly the same with the arbitration agreement;whether a conciliation statement can be set aside or disallowed.