期刊文献+

股权分置、看涨期权与中国股市之谜——一个新的理论框架 被引量:1

Stock Market Segmentation,Call Option and China Stock Market's Puzzles——a New Theory Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文论证了股权分置格局下非流通股流通权的看涨期权性质,这一发现在定性方面澄清了过去对"流通股含权"的模糊认识,在定量方面也提供了一套统一、有力的分析工具,并根据股权分置试点方案做了应用分析。以上述发现为基础,本文进一步揭示了我国股市独特的"四维定价机制",这一新的理论框架对我国股市过去及当前的诸多谜团有着惊人的解释力,如一级市场的IPO高抑价和IPO长期回报不佳,二级市场的持续低迷和结构调整。 This paper proves that call option is the essence of Circulation right of non-tradable shares on condition that Stock Market Segmentation exists.This conclusion not only clarifies some vague thoughts about tradable shares'owing some rights,but also provides useful facilities.Furthermore,the paper reveals unique Four-dimension Pricing Mechanism of China Stock Market.The new framework can easily answer many China Puzzles such as high IPOs underpricing,IPOs long-term underperformance,lasting bear market,restructure of prices,etc.
作者 李庆峰
出处 《制度经济学研究》 2005年第4期77-98,共22页 Research on Institutional Economics
关键词 股权分置 看涨期权 四维定价机制 Stock Market Segmentation Call Option Four-dimension Pricing Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

  • 1罗飞,李书锋,唐国平.论国有企业财务机制制度创新[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),1999,4(1):32-35. 被引量:5
  • 2刘力,李文德.中国股市股票首次公开发行首日超额收益研究[J].中国会计与财务研究,2000,2(4):1-53. 被引量:35
  • 3李树辉.首次公开发行的长期考察[J].湘潭工学院学报(社会科学版),2001,3(1):13-15. 被引量:10
  • 4[2](美)E·博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
  • 5[1]R ·RITTER. The long-run performance of initial public offerings[J].Journal of Finance, 1991,(1).
  • 6[2]SINDEIAR, RITTER.Initial public offerings ibbotson[J].Journal of applied corporate finance,1988,(3).
  • 7[3]IBBOTSON, ROGERPRICE. performance of common stock new issues [J]. Journal of financial economics, 1975,(3).
  • 8[3](美)詹姆斯·安修.美国宪法解释与判例[M].黎建飞译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994,145.
  • 9[6](美)史蒂文·凯尔曼.制定公共政策[M].商正译,北京:商务印书馆,1990.114.
  • 10[9]Karl Larenz.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥译.台北:五南图书出版有限公司,1996,313.

共引文献153

同被引文献13

  • 1Amihud, Y. , and H. Mendelson, 1991, "Liquidity, Asset Prices and Financial Policy", Financial Analysts Journal 47 : 56 - 66.
  • 2Amihud, Y. , 2002, “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects”, Journal of Financial Markets 5:31 -56.
  • 3Amihud, Y. , and Haim Mendelson, 1986, "Asset Pricing and the Bid-ask Spread", Journal of Financial Economics 17 : 223 - 249.
  • 4Brennan, M. J. A. and Subrahmanyam, 1996, “Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: on the Compensation of Illiquidity in Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics 41:441 -464.
  • 5Brennan, M. , Chordia, T. , and Subrahmanyam A. , 1998, "Ahemative Factor Specifications, Security Characteristics, and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns", Journal of Financial Economics 49:345 -373.
  • 6Chen, G. M. , Lee, B. S. , and O. Rui, 2001, "Foreign Ownership Restrictions and Market Segmentation in China' s Stock Market", Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 24, Feb: 133 - 155.
  • 7Chen, Z. , and P. Xiong, 2001,“Discounts on illiquid stocks: evidence from China”, Working paper, Yale University.
  • 8Daves, P. R. , and M. C. Ehrhardt, 1993, "Liquidity, Reconstitution, and the Value of U. S. Treasury Stipes", Journal of Finance 48 : 315 -329.
  • 9Grinblatt, M. , and F. L Longstaff, 1995, "Liquidity and the Pricing of Treasury Securities", Working Paper, UCLA.
  • 10Modigliani, F. , and M. H. Miller, 1958, "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investments", American Economic Review 48:261 -297.

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部