2Borman, W. C and Motowidlo, S. J. Expanding the CriterionDomain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance[C]. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eels),Personnel Se-lection in Organizations (pp. 71 - 98 ). San Francisco:Jossey- Bass. 1993.
3Coleman, V. I, and Borman, W. C. Investigating the under-lying structure of the citizenship performance domain [J ].Human Resource Management Review, 2000,10:25 - 44.
4Rotundo, M. and Sackett. P. R. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance toglobal ratings of job performance [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87: 66 - 80.
5Arvey, R. D. & Murphy, K. R. Performance evaluation in work setting [ J ]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998,49:141 - 168.
6Conway, J. M. Distinguish contextual performance from task performance for mangagerial jobs [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84 : 3 - 13.
7Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. The Social psychology of organizations (2nd Ed. )[M]. New York:Wiley. 1978.
8Motowidlo, S. J., and Van Scotter,J. R. Evidence that task performance should be distinguish from contextual performance [J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994,79: 475 -480.
9Van Scotter, J. R., and Motowidlo, S. J. Interpersonal Facilitation and Job Dedication as Sepearate Facets of Contextual Peformance [J ]. Jouranl of Applied Psychology, 1996,81 : 525 - 531.
10Kiker, D. S. and Motowidlo, S. J. Main and interaction effects of task and performance on supervisory reward decisions [ J ]. Journal Applied Psychology, 1999, 84 : 602 -609.
