期刊文献+

A、B股之间的风险溢出效应分析——基于CoVaR方法的实证研究 被引量:1

Risk Spillover Effects Between Chinese A and B Stock——A research based on the CoVaR method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用条件风险价值CoVaR方法,结合分位数回归技术,对我国A、B股之间在2001年2月23日前、2001年2月24日至2005年4月29日间和2005年4月30日后这三个阶段的风险溢出效应进行实证分析。研究结论表明:对于上证和深证市场内部而言,无论是在B股向境内投资者开放前后还是在股权分置改革前后,上证A、B股之间和深证A、B股之间均存在正的双向风险溢出效应,并且两个市场内部的A股对B股的风险溢出效应要明显地大于B股对A股的溢出效应;而对于上证和深证市场之间而言,在股权分置改革之前,上证A股和深证A股之间的风险溢出效应要明显大于两市场B股之间的溢出效应,而在股权分置改革之后则刚好相反。同时,在三个不同的阶段,上证A股对深证B股和深证A股对上证B股的风险溢出效应均大于深证B股对上证A股和上证B股对深证A股的溢出效应。 This paper applies the Conditional Value at Risk(CoVaR)method,accompanying the quantile regression technology,to analyze the risk spillover effects between Chinese A and B stocks at the different periods,that is, before February 23rd,2001,during February 24th,2001 and April 29th,2005,and after April 30th,2005,respectively.Empirical results show that on the one hand,for internal sections of Chinese stock markets,A and B stocks of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange Market both exist positive and two-way risk spillover effects,and the risk spillover effects from A to B stock is much greater than that from B to A.On the other hand,between Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange Markets,the risk spillover effects between A stock of Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets are significantly greater than that of B stocks of these two markets before April 29th,2005.While after April 30th, 2005,this comparison relationship is just opposite.At all these three periods,the risk spillover effects from A stock of Shanghai to B stock of Shenzhen and from A stock of Shenzhen to B stock of Shanghai are both greater than that from B stocks to A stocks of these two markets,respectively.
作者 魏龙
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2011年第4期84-90,共7页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词 风险溢出效应 CoVaR方法 分位数回归 A、B股 Risk Spillover Effects CoVaR Method Quantile Regression A and B Stock
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1张碧琼.中国股票市场信息国际化:基于EGARCH模型的检验[J].国际金融研究,2005(5):68-73. 被引量:39
  • 2赵振全,苏治,丁志国.中国证券市场波动的区制关联性[J].财贸经济,2005,26(11):34-38. 被引量:3
  • 3Hamao, Y, Masulis, R W and Ng, V, 1990, Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 3, 281 -307.
  • 4Hamilton, James D, 1994, Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.
  • 5King, M, Sentana, E. and Wadhwani, S. 1994, Volatility and links between national stock markets, Econometrica, vol.62, 901 -933.
  • 6King, M, and Wadhwani, S. 1990, transmission of volatility between stock markets, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 3,5- 33.
  • 7Kroner, K F, and Ng, V K. 1998, Modeling asymmetric comovements of asset returns, Review of Financial Studies, vol.11, 817-844.
  • 8Lamoureux, Christopner G, and William D. Lastrapes,1993.Forecasting stock return variance: Toward an understanding of stochastic implied volatilities, Review of Financial Studies vol. 5, 293 - 326.
  • 9Lan, S T and Diltz, J D, 1994, Stock returns and the transfer of information between the New York and Tokyo stock cachanges, Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 13, 211 -222.
  • 10Mandelbrot, B, 1963, The variation of certain speculative prices, Journal of Business vol. 36, 394- 419.

共引文献248

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部