摘要
本文基于对《四库全书总目提要》明代史评提要阅读的基础上展开述论。《四库全书总目提要》为中国古典目录学集大成之作。其史部设"史评类",著录历代史评著述。明代史评收入正目仅有2部,而列入存目却多达61部。《提要》对明代史评的评论,既有对明代学风之批驳,又有对于明代学者史学素养之褒贬。《提要》对史评经典《史通》极为推崇,在对明代《史通》研究的批评中表达了对于明代史学研究的认识。对明代史评著述的评论中,反映着《提要》之史学观念与评论方法。
This paper is based on The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries.And this book is the classic of Chinese ancient bibliography.The Part of History criticizes the history and many essays of history comments before.Only two Ming historical comments are in records while the other sixty-one are all in save.The comments of Ming focused on the learning style in Ming Dynasty and scholars' quality during that period.The Synopsis held the study of history in high esteem,and it presents the understanding of historical research in Ming Dynasty.The concept of historical research and commentary methods can be found in the synopsis through its comments on the works of history criticism in Ming.
出处
《华中师范大学研究生学报》
2010年第1期97-101,共5页
Central China Normal University Journal of Postgraduates
关键词
《四库全书总目》
明代史评
《史通》
The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries
the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty
the study of history