期刊文献+

《四库全书总目》明代史评提要述论 被引量:1

The Study of the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty in The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于对《四库全书总目提要》明代史评提要阅读的基础上展开述论。《四库全书总目提要》为中国古典目录学集大成之作。其史部设"史评类",著录历代史评著述。明代史评收入正目仅有2部,而列入存目却多达61部。《提要》对明代史评的评论,既有对明代学风之批驳,又有对于明代学者史学素养之褒贬。《提要》对史评经典《史通》极为推崇,在对明代《史通》研究的批评中表达了对于明代史学研究的认识。对明代史评著述的评论中,反映着《提要》之史学观念与评论方法。 This paper is based on The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries.And this book is the classic of Chinese ancient bibliography.The Part of History criticizes the history and many essays of history comments before.Only two Ming historical comments are in records while the other sixty-one are all in save.The comments of Ming focused on the learning style in Ming Dynasty and scholars' quality during that period.The Synopsis held the study of history in high esteem,and it presents the understanding of historical research in Ming Dynasty.The concept of historical research and commentary methods can be found in the synopsis through its comments on the works of history criticism in Ming.
作者 李程
出处 《华中师范大学研究生学报》 2010年第1期97-101,共5页 Central China Normal University Journal of Postgraduates
关键词 《四库全书总目》 明代史评 《史通》 The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty the study of history
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1(唐)刘知几 撰(清)浦起龙 释史通通释[M].

同被引文献21

  • 1清·黄虞稷撰,瞿凤起、潘景郑整理.千顷堂书目[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.
  • 2明·高儒.百川书志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005.
  • 3.《四库全书》[M].,..
  • 4[元]马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 5宋·陈振孙.直斋书录解题[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
  • 6晁公武撰,孙猛校证.《郡斋读书志校证》,上海古籍出版社1990年版,第801页.
  • 7清·永瘩.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965:866.
  • 8黄永年《史部要籍概勘,江苏教育出版社,2008版,第178-179页.
  • 9宋·王尧臣编,钱东垣等辑.崇文总目[M].丛书集成初编本.
  • 10宋·佚名.秘书省续编到四库阙书目[M].北京:中华书局,2006:299-300.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部