期刊文献+

对未治疗或行Heller肌切除术失败的失弛缓症患者行气囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症

Pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia in untreated patients and patients with failed Heller myotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM) has become an increasingly preferred modality to treat achalasia. However, the treatment course after a failed myotomy is controversial with fears that pneumatic dilation (PD) has high perforation risk. Goal: To compare success and safety of graded PD with Rigiflex balloons in achalasia patients without a prior HM (untreated cases) and those with a failed HM. Study: A total of 108 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 96 untre ated cases (53 male, 43 female, mean age 51 years) and 12 failed HM (7 male, 5 female, mean age 54 years). Symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation) and physiologic studies, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and timed barium swallow, assessed pre-and post-PD. Success was defined as: 1) symptom improvement to ≤ 2 to 4 times per week, and 2) ≥80%decrease in 5-minute barium column height from initial timed barium swallow. Results: A total of 139 PDs performed (117 unt reated cases, 22 failed HM): 2 perforations in untreated cases and none in faile d HM group. Baseline demographics were similar, but failed HM patients had signi ficantly lower LESP and timed barium swallow columns. Despite less LES resistance, failed HM group (symptom and physiologic success: 50%and 10%) did not do as well after PD as compared with untreated cases (symptom and physiologic success : 74%and 52%, respectively). Five failed HM patients had good symptom relief a fter PD compared with poor responders these patients were older (>50 years) and had LESP >17 mm Hg. Conclusions: PD perforation risk is not higher after HM. Des pite lower LES pressure, patients undergoing PD after failed HM do not do as well as untreated cases. Factors predicting better outcome include older age and higher LES pressure. Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM) has become an increasingly preferred modality to treat achalasia. However, the treatment course after a failed myotomy is controversial with fears that pneumatic dilation (PD) has high perforation risk. Goal: To compare success and safety of graded PD with Rigiflex balloons in achalasia patients without a prior HM (untreated cases) and those with a failed HM. Study: A total of 108 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 96 untre ated cases (53 male, 43 female, mean age 51 years) and 12 failed HM (7 male, 5 female, mean age 54 years). Symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation) and physiologic studies, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and timed barium swallow, assessed pre-and post-PD. Success was defined as: 1) symptom improvement to ≤ 2 to 4 times per week, and 2) ≥80%decrease in 5-minute barium column height from initial timed barium swallow. Results: A total of 139 PDs performed (117 unt reated cases, 22 failed HM): 2 perforations in untreated cases and none in faile d HM group. Baseline demographics were similar, but failed HM patients had signi ficantly lower LESP and timed barium swallow columns. Despite less LES resistance, failed HM group (symptom and physiologic success: 50%and 10%) did not do as well after PD as compared with untreated cases (symptom and physiologic success : 74%and 52%, respectively). Five failed HM patients had good symptom relief a fter PD compared with poor responders these patients were older (>50 years) and had LESP >17 mm Hg. Conclusions: PD perforation risk is not higher after HM. Des pite lower LES pressure, patients undergoing PD after failed HM do not do as well as untreated cases. Factors predicting better outcome include older age and higher LES pressure.
机构地区 Department of Medicine
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册)》 2005年第4期48-49,共2页 Core Journals in Gastroenterology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部