期刊文献+

奥美拉唑三联疗法与兰索拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌比较

Effectiveness of omeprazole-versus lansoprazolebased triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithrom ycin is widely accepted for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The choice of PPI for triple therapy in Israel is arbitrary, with no preference for any one PPI exc ept for economic considerations. Direct comparison between omeprazole and lansop razole for efficacy of H. pylori eradication has never been performed in an Isra eli poplulation. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, lansoprazole-based therapy may be a better alternative than omeprazole-based therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of triple therapy regimens with omeprazole (L osec, AstraZeneca; or Omeradex, Dexxon) or lansoprazole (TAP Pharmaceuticals) in eradicating H. pylori infection. The database of the biggest health insurance p rovider in Israel was reviewed for all patients who received 1 week of treatment with omeprazole (n = 1293) or lansoprazole (n = 85) with additional amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori eradication in 2002. All patients underwent th e 13C-urea breath test (13CUBT) for validation of eradication. A negative 13CUB T result was noted in 1026 of the patients treated with omeprazole (79.4%) and 61 treated with lansoprazole (71.8%). On logistic regression analysis, none of the confounding factors (sex, age, indication, chronic use of PPI, eradication p rotocol) were found to contribute to the discrimination between a negative (succ essful eradication) and a positive (failed eradication) 13CUBT. There is no stat istically significant difference between omeprazole and lansoprazole as part of a PPI-based triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori. Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithrom ycin is widely accepted for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The choice of PPI for triple therapy in Israel is arbitrary, with no preference for any one PPI exc ept for economic considerations. Direct comparison between omeprazole and lansop razole for efficacy of H. pylori eradication has never been performed in an Isra eli poplulation. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, lansoprazole-based therapy may be a better alternative than omeprazole-based therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of triple therapy regimens with omeprazole (L osec, AstraZeneca; or Omeradex, Dexxon) or lansoprazole (TAP Pharmaceuticals) in eradicating H. pylori infection. The database of the biggest health insurance p rovider in Israel was reviewed for all patients who received 1 week of treatment with omeprazole (n = 1293) or lansoprazole (n = 85) with additional amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori eradication in 2002. All patients underwent th e 13C-urea breath test (13CUBT) for validation of eradication. A negative 13CUB T result was noted in 1026 of the patients treated with omeprazole (79.4%) and 61 treated with lansoprazole (71.8%). On logistic regression analysis, none of the confounding factors (sex, age, indication, chronic use of PPI, eradication p rotocol) were found to contribute to the discrimination between a negative (succ essful eradication) and a positive (failed eradication) 13CUBT. There is no stat istically significant difference between omeprazole and lansoprazole as part of a PPI-based triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori.
作者 Niv Y. 李翔
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册)》 2005年第9期8-9,共2页 Core Journals in Gastroenterology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部