期刊文献+

控制式回肠造口术:目前经验 被引量:1

Continent ileostomy: Current experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 PURPOSE: This study was designed to review our recent experience with continent ileostomies and evaluate patient outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews and phone interviews of patients who underwent a continent ileostomy operation from 1993 to 2003 at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (19 females; age range, 22- 73 years) had construction of continent ileostomies (modified Kock pouch). There were no intraoperative mortalities or stoma-related deaths. The mean operating room time for primary constructionwas 3.9 ± 0.57 hours with a mean length of stay of 7 ± 2 days. The average follow-up period was 66 (range, 6- 134) months. The most common underlying indication for the construction of a continent ileostomy was ulcerative colitis (71 percent). Thirteen patients had a co-ntinent ileostomy created for conversion of a Brooke ileostomy and seven for a failed ileoanal pouch. Other indications included colonic inertia and incontinence in three patients and one patient who had failed multiple operations for Hirschsprung’s disease. A total of 28 revisions were performed in 14 patients (58 percent). Six patients requir-ed multiple procedures. Operative revisions included 12 skin level revision for stenosis, 11 operations for valve repairs, and 1 each for peristomal hernia repair, stomal relocation, and pouch repair for fistulas. Two patients had their pouches removed (Crohn’s disease and inability to manage pouch). The need for revision by 12 months was 29 percent, and the average time period before the first revision was 24 months (range, 4 days to 109 months). The overall failure rate (converted to conventional ileostomy)was only 8.3 percent. Ninety percent of the patients have continent pouches and are satisfied with their pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Continent ileostomies continue to have a high rate of reoperations, reasonable functional results, and are a viable option for failed ileal pouch anal pouch patients. Surgeons electing to perform continent ileostomies must carefully select their patients and advise them of the high potential for reoperations. Despite a high reoperation rate, patients are pleased with their continent ileostomies. PURPOSE: This study was designed to review our recent experience with continent ileostomies and evaluate patient outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews and phone interviews of patients who underwent a continent ileostomy operation from 1993 to 2003 at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (19 females; age range, 22- 73 years) had construction of continent ileostomies (modified Kock pouch). There were no intraoperative mortalities or stoma-related deaths. The mean operating room time for primary constructionwas 3.9 ± 0.57 hours with a mean length of stay of 7 ± 2 days. The average follow-up period was 66 (range, 6- 134) months. The most common underlying indication for the construction of a continent ileostomy was ulcerative colitis (71 percent). Thirteen patients had a co-ntinent ileostomy created for conversion of a Brooke ileostomy and seven for a failed ileoanal pouch. Other indications included colonic inertia and incontinence in three patients and one patient who had failed multiple operations for Hirschsprung's disease. A total of 28 revisions were performed in 14 patients (58 percent). Six patients requir-ed multiple procedures. Operative revisions included 12 skin level revision for stenosis, 11 operations for valve repairs, and 1 each for peristomal hernia repair, stomal relocation, and pouch repair for fistulas. Two patients had their pouches removed (Crohn's disease and inability to manage pouch). The need for revision by 12 months was 29 percent, and the average time period before the first revision was 24 months (range, 4 days to 109 months). The overall failure rate (converted to conventional ileostomy)was only 8.3 percent. Ninety percent of the patients have continent pouches and are satisfied with their pouch function. CONCLUSIONS: Continent ileostomies continue to have a high rate of reoperations, reasonable functional results, and are a viable option for failed ileal pouch anal pouch patients. Surgeons electing to perform continent ileostomies must carefully select their patients and advise them of the high potential for reoperations. Despite a high reoperation rate, patients are pleased with their continent ileostomies.
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册)》 2005年第11期19-20,共2页 Core Journals in Gastroenterology
  • 相关文献

同被引文献12

  • 1Julie A. Cornish MBBCh, MRCS,Henry S. Tilney MBBS, MRCS,Alexander G. Heriot MD, FRCS,Ian C. Lavery MD,Victor W. Fazio MD,Paris P. Tekkis MD, FRCS. A Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life for Abdominoperineal Excision of Rectum versus Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J] 2007,Annals of Surgical Oncology(7):2056~2068
  • 2J. L. Dulucq,P. Wintringer,A. Mahajna. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases[J] 2006,Surgical Endoscopy(7):1045~1050
  • 3Eduardo Castillo M.D.,Lauren M. Thomassie,Charles B. Whitlow M.D.,David A. Margolin M.D.,Jasmine Malcolm M.D.,David E. Beck M.D.. Continent Ileostomy: Current Experience[J] 2005,Diseases of the Colon & Rectum(6):1263~1268
  • 4Christian E. Schmidt M.D., M.P.H.,Beate Bestmann M.A.,Thomas Kuchler Ph.D.,Walter E. Longo M.D. M.B.A.,Bernd Kremer M.D., Ph.D.. Impact of Age on Quality of Life in Patients with Rectal Cancer[J] 2005,World Journal of Surgery(2):190~197
  • 5B. J. Ammori. Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience[J] 2004,Surgical Endoscopy(4):717~718
  • 6B. Edwin,T. Mala,?. Mathisen,I. Gladhaug,T. Buanes,O. C. Lunde,O. S?reide,A. Bergan,E. Fosse. Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas: a feasibility study of the short-term outcome[J] 2004,Surgical Endoscopy(3):407~411
  • 7Gerard V. Aranha M.D., F.R.C.S.C., F.A.C.S.,Pamela Hodul M.D.,Eugene Golts M.D.,Daniel Oh M.D.,Jack Pickleman M.D., F.A.C.S.,Steven Creech M.S.. A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy[J] 2003,Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery(5):672~682
  • 8Jae Sik Joo M.D.,Jean F. Latulippe M.D.,Omer Alabaz M.D.,Eric G. Weiss M.D.,Juan J. Nogueras M.D.,Dr. Steven D. Wexner M.D.. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch[J] 1998,Diseases of the Colon & Rectum(6):740~746
  • 9Mr. R. J. Heald,M. Chir.,R. K. Smedh M.D., Ph.D.,A. Kald M.D., Ph.D.,R. Sexton B.Sc.,B. J. Moran M.Ch.. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—An endangered operation[J] 1997,Diseases of the Colon & Rectum(7):747~751
  • 10Jan Svedlund,Marianne Sullivan,Bengt Liedman,Lars Lundell,Ingemar Sj?din. Quality of Life after Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Controlled Study of Reconstructive Procedures[J] 1997,World Journal of Surgery(4):422~433

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部