期刊文献+

原发性肝癌临床分期标准的探讨 被引量:2

Discussion on the Clinical Staging Criterion of Primary Liver Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨适合我国原发性肝癌的临床分期标准。方法 回顾性分析复旦大学肝癌研究所收治的 42 7例原发性肝癌病例的临床资料 ,分析各分期标准所含指标与预后的相关性、各分期标准对根治性切除率及术后预后的反映程度。结果 肿瘤大小、数目、合并癌栓及肝硬化为肝癌患者预后的相关因素 ,具体分组与肝癌专业委员会制定的标准较一致 ,在反映根治性切除率及术后预后时 ,肝癌专业委员会制定的分期标准比较有价值。结论 在几种分期标准中 。 Objective To compare several staging criterions and investigate the reasonable one for Chinese primary liver cancer.Methods The Primary liver cancer patients at the Liver Cancer Institute of Fudan University were retrospectively analysed,and then the relativity between the different factors and the prognosis,as well as the difference of the curative resection rate and the prognosis for different stages were also analysed.Results The size,number of the tumor and the vascular invasion were independent factors of the prognosis.For the grouping,the staging designed by the Liver Cancer Group of the Chinese Anti cancer Association was the most suitable one.It also reflected the curative resection rate and the prognosis after curative resection.Conclusion The staging made by Liver Cancer Group is the most reasonable one for Chinese patients.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2002年第5期523-526,529,共5页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 原发性肝癌 根治性切除 临床分期 预后 影响因素 Primary liver cancer Curative resection Clinical staging Survival rate Disease free survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1吴孟超,张柏和.我国肝脏外科现状和发展前景[J].中华外科杂志,1996,34(9):515-517. 被引量:45
  • 2吴孟超 马曾辰 等.临床分期标准及小肝癌定义.中国常见恶性肿瘤规范原发性肝癌分册[M].北京:北京医科大学,协和医科大学联合出版社,1990.12-14.
  • 3杨秉辉 汤钊猷 等.原发性肝癌临床分型分期问题的研究.原发性肝癌的研究与进展[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1990.124-125.
  • 4贾雨辰,中国医学影像学杂志,1994年,2卷,56页
  • 5林贵,中华放射学杂志,1992年,26卷,311页
  • 6刘崎,中华放射学杂志,1991年,25卷,152页
  • 7吴孟超,中华外科杂志,1996年,34卷,515页
  • 8杨秉辉,原发性肝癌的研究与进展,1990年,124页
  • 9吴孟超,中国常见恶性肿瘤诊疗规范原发性肝癌分期,1990年,12页

共引文献56

同被引文献26

  • 1杨秉辉,任正刚.关于肝癌的一些临床问题之商榷[J].中国临床医学,2001,8(1):1-2. 被引量:4
  • 2Bismuth H, Majno, PE, Adam R, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Semin Liver Dis, 1999,19:311-322.
  • 3吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M] 第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.1276.
  • 4Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al . Estimating the world cancer burden: GLOBOCAN 2000[J]. Int J Cancer , 2001, 94:153-156.
  • 5Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment[J]. Cancer ,1985,56:918-928.
  • 6Izumi R, Shimizu K, Ii T, et al. Prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing hepatic resection[J]. Gastroenterology ,1994,106 : 720-727.
  • 7The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma, a retrospective study of 435 patients [J]. Hepatology ,1998, 28: 751-755.
  • 8Chevret S. Chastang C for the Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome H'epatocellulaire. A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol ,1999,31: 133-141.
  • 9Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification[J]. Semin Liver Dis , 1999,19:329-338.
  • 10Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer (in Japanese)[M]. 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara ,2000.19.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部