期刊文献+

10年前后非独生子女间个性差异研究 被引量:2

A Matched Study:Are There Any Differences in Personality of the Children with Siblings between 10 Years ago and at Present.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 提倡独生子女政策之前的非独生子女与成为特殊人群后的非独生子女之间的个性有无差异 ?方法 分别对于推行独生子女政策以前和推行独生子女政策以后出生的 1 6~ 1 8岁城市高中部非独生子女 ,用 MMPI集中测试。结果 女性组 :非独生女之间 MMPI的 F、D、Ma3个量表获分低于 1 0年前 ,K量表获分高于 1 0年前统计学上有显著性差异。男性组 ,1 0年前后非独生子之间的 MMPI各量表获分无显著性差异 ;结论  1 0年前后非独生女之间的个性有一定的差异 ,现在的非独生女的个性优于 1 Objective To learn the personality of the children with siblings at present and difference compared with that of 10 years ago,after being a special crowd.Methods Give a concentrating test dividedly to two groups with MMPI,one is 158(male:89 and female:69),another is 197(male:117,female:80).senior urban children with siblings both were 16~18 years old and born before or after the launching of the only-child policy.Results In female group,the F?D and Ma scale scores of the MMPI are lower than that of 10 years ago.K scale score is higher than that of 10 years ago with significant statistic difference.In male group,there are no significant differences between two groups.Conclusions There are some difference in the personality of the children with siblings between 10 years ago and at present.At present the personality of the female children with siblings is prior to that of 10 years ago,There are no significant differences between the male children with siblings.
出处 《健康心理学杂志》 2002年第6期415-416,共2页 Health Psychology Journal
关键词 非独生子女 个性 MMPI Children with siblings Personality MMPI
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献1

  • 1陶国泰,中华神经精神科杂志,1986年,6期,321页

共引文献395

同被引文献18

  • 1王沛.刻板印象的内隐效应与内一外群体效应的实验研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):178-180. 被引量:11
  • 2赵小军 扶卿华 陈滕云.大学生对不同地区人群的刻板印象研究.国际中华心身医学杂志,2004,(1):32-33.
  • 3Carey ,S.R., Laura, M.B.Development of new group member' s in-group and out-group stereotypes :changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997,73(4): 719-732.
  • 4Fiske S T, Cuddy AJ C, Ghck P S, et al.A model of (often mixed) stereoWpe content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82:878-902.
  • 5Fiske S T, Xu J, Cuddy A J C, et al. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warrnth.Jourlaal of Social Issues, 1999, 55:473-489.
  • 6Lin M D, Kwan V S Y, Cheung A, et al.Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Out-group: Scale of Anti-Asian American Stereotypes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31 (1): 34-47.
  • 7Carey ,S.R., Laura, M.B. Development of new group member' s in-group and out-group stereotypes :changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism, Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 1997,73(4):719-732.
  • 8Fiske S T, Cuddy A J C, Glick P S, et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Compe- tence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology, 2002, 82:878-902.
  • 9Fiske S T, Xu J, Cuddy A J C, et al. (Dis)re- specting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 1999, 55:473-489.
  • 10Lin M D, Kwan V S Y, Cheung A, et al. Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Out-group: Scale of Anti-Asian American Stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bul- letin, 2005, 31(1): 34-47.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部