摘要
通过对我国渎职犯罪主体立法状况的回顾和与部分国家、地区渎职罪立法比较 ,当前我国渎职犯罪主体法律规定的缺陷表现在 :一是刑法对渎职犯罪主体的规定与我国现实国情不符 ,存在较大漏洞 ;二是渎职犯罪法条过于细化 ,条款比较繁琐 ;三是部分法条的犯罪主体与实践中行为主体不符。我国立法应将渎职犯罪的主体规定为国家机关工作人员和其他从事公务的人员 。
Following a retrospect to the legislative history concerning the subject of the crime of malfeasance in China and a comparative study on the legislation about the crime between different countries and regions, the author finds that there are three major drawbacks in the prescription with regard to the subject of the crime of malfeasance, namely, the nonconformity between the law and the current situation of the country; the overloaded with details prescription of the crime; the inconsistency between the subject of the crime in stipulations and that in practice. The author subsequently suggests that state functionaries and other persons who are engaged in official duties should be the subject of the crime of malfeasance, and meanwhile, the names of the crime in current criminal law ought to be properly revised.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
2002年第5期46-52,共7页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
河南省人民检察院承担的最高人民检察院检察应用理论重点研究课题
关键词
渎职罪
国家机关工作人员
发案主体
crime of malfeasance
state functionaries
the subject of action