期刊文献+

保卫程序:一个自由主义者对卡尔·施密特例外理论的批评 被引量:15

Protection Programme:Criticisms Made by A Lipberalist on Karl Schmitt's Exceptionalism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卡尔·施密特所提出的例外问题对程序民主构成了挑战。文章试图通过讨论和克服例外问题来保卫程序主义的一致性。文章检讨了施密特例外概念的矛盾 ,批评了他的两个错误假设 :例外是程序的对立者 ,决策优于规则。
作者 何包钢
机构地区 新加坡国立大学
出处 《浙江学刊》 CSSCI 2002年第2期73-80,共8页 Zhejiang Academic Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Brennan, Geoffrey & Buchanan, James M. (1985), The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy (London: Cambridge University Press).
  • 2DworkIn, Ronald (1977), Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
  • 3Hardin, Russell (1980)'The Emergence of Norms', Ethics, 90, pp. 575-87.
  • 4Hardin, Russell. (1988), Morality within the Limits of Reason (Chicago: the University of Chicago Press).
  • 5McCormick, John P (1993), 'Addressing the Political Exception: Machiavelli's "Accidents" and the Mixed Regime,' American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 888-90.
  • 6Nicoletti, Michele (1987)'A Review of Carl Schmitt nella Stampa Pericxtica Italiana (1973-1986)', Tolos, No. 72, pp. 217-24.
  • 7Pye, Lucian W. (1968),The Spirit of Chinese Polities A Psychocultural study of the Authority Crisis in Political Development (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M. I. T. Press).
  • 8Rawls, John (1964)'Two Concepts of Rules', Philosophical Review, Vol. 55, pp. 3-32.
  • 9Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon).
  • 10Sarnples, John (1987) 'A Review of Political Theology, and The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy', Tolos, No. 72, pp. 205-14.

共引文献5

同被引文献229

引证文献15

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部