期刊文献+

论民事诉讼中的证明要求

Viewpoints on Testifying Degree in Civil Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来 ,我国在民事诉讼中一贯坚持客观真实的证明要求。但是 ,随着我国经济体制改革的不断深化 ,民事审判方式也在不断地发生变化 ,客观真实的证明要求既无现实性又无可操作性的弊端越来越明显。为此 ,本文作者认为 ,我国应借鉴国外一些成熟的做法并根据我国司法实际 ,在民事诉讼中确立盖然性占优势的证明要求 ,并建立相应的制约机制 ,从而完善我国民事诉讼中的证明要求 ,使其既具有科学性又具有可操作性 ,以便于实现民事诉讼的诉讼任务。 For a long time,we have considered objective truth as testifying degree in China.But with the deepening of the economic reform,the mode of civil trial has also changed constantly.Objective truth as testifying degree is neither practical nor serviceable.Its defects become more and more obvious.For this reason, the paper holds that we should make use of the methods successfully used by other countries,determine the preponderance of probability in civil process as testifying degree and establish corresponding restrictive system on the basis of real conditions of our judicature,so that we can fulfil the task of civil process.
作者 严军
出处 《甘肃政法学院学报》 2001年第3期70-73,共4页 Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词 民事诉讼 证明要求 客观真实标准 盖然性 中国 证据 Testifying degree Objective truth Preponderane of probability Restriction.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1陈一云主编.《证据学》,中国人民大学出版社,1990年版,第31页、第94页、第34页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部