摘要
长期以来 ,我国在民事诉讼中一贯坚持客观真实的证明要求。但是 ,随着我国经济体制改革的不断深化 ,民事审判方式也在不断地发生变化 ,客观真实的证明要求既无现实性又无可操作性的弊端越来越明显。为此 ,本文作者认为 ,我国应借鉴国外一些成熟的做法并根据我国司法实际 ,在民事诉讼中确立盖然性占优势的证明要求 ,并建立相应的制约机制 ,从而完善我国民事诉讼中的证明要求 ,使其既具有科学性又具有可操作性 ,以便于实现民事诉讼的诉讼任务。
For a long time,we have considered objective truth as testifying degree in China.But with the deepening of the economic reform,the mode of civil trial has also changed constantly.Objective truth as testifying degree is neither practical nor serviceable.Its defects become more and more obvious.For this reason, the paper holds that we should make use of the methods successfully used by other countries,determine the preponderance of probability in civil process as testifying degree and establish corresponding restrictive system on the basis of real conditions of our judicature,so that we can fulfil the task of civil process.
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
2001年第3期70-73,共4页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词
民事诉讼
证明要求
客观真实标准
盖然性
中国
证据
Testifying degree
Objective truth
Preponderane of probability
Restriction.