期刊文献+

同时推量加速调强放疗治疗头颈部恶性肿瘤的临床研究 被引量:2

Simultaneous integrated boost with intensity modulated accelerated radiation therapy on patients with head and neck cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用同时推量加速调强放疗技术 (SIB- IMART)治疗 15例头颈部恶性肿瘤 ,肉眼靶区 (GTV)的平均剂量为 70 Gy,临床靶区 (CTV)的平均剂量为 5 4 Gy,脑干、脊髓及腮腺等正常组织的受量均在允许范围之内。结果13例 38天内完成治疗 ,2例因副作用而中断放疗 ;皮肤反应 级 12例、 级 3例 ;粘膜反应 级 9例、 级 4例、 级 2例 ,咽部及食管 级 10例、 级 3例、 级 2例 ;唾液腺副作用明显较传统放疗技术轻 ,15例中 0级 3例、 级 10例、 级 2例 ;口干 0级 3例、 级 9例、 级 3例 ,无重度或完全口干病例。放疗结束后疗效达 CR者 13例 ,PR者 2例 ,无一例出现病情进展。认为 SIB- IMART治疗头颈部恶性肿瘤安全可行 ,特别是腮腺可受到较好保护 ,且不同的靶区可以同时实现不同的剂量水平 。 To evaluate the feasibility of head and neck cancer treated with simultaneous integrated boost with intensity modulated accelerated radiation therapy(SIB IMART).15 patients with primary head and neck cancers were treated with SIB IMART technique.The treatment fields encompassed two simultaneous targets.The gross tumor volume (GTV) included palpable and visible disease.The clinical tumor volume (CTV) included sites at risk for microscopic disease.Total dose of 67.2 Gy in daily fraction of 2.4 Gy and 5 days weekly was prescribed to the GTV whilst total dose of 50.4 Gy in fraction size of 1.8 Gy to the CTV.Acute toxicity was evaluated by RTOG toxicity grading criteria.Initial tumor response was assessed by clinical and radiographical examinations.The mean doses to the GTV and CTV were 70 Gy and 54Gy.The doses to brainstem,spinal cord,and parotids were below their dose limits.All of the patients except for 2 ones completed their treatment within 38 days without any split.12 patients had RTOG grade 1 skin toxicity and the other had grade 2.Grade 2 mucositis occurred in 9 patients,grade 3 in 4 patients,and grade 4 in the other 2 patients.10 patients had grade 1 pharyngitis and esophagitis,3 patients had grade 2,and 2 patients had grade 3.87% patients had grade 1 or less toxicity with the salivary gland and no patients had higher than grade 2 toxicity.12 of 15 patients reported grade 1 or less mouth dryness.3 patients had grade 2 symptoms but none experienced severe or complete xerostomia.13 of 15 patients had complete response (CR) while the other patients had partial response (PR).These suggest that the patients with head and neck carcinomas treated with SIB IMART technique are clinically feasible.Though the mucositis toxicity is somewhat severe,the parotids are spared satisfactorily.Initial tumor response has been encouraging.Furthermore,the technique has the advantages of delivering different doses to different targets simultaneously and shortening the treatment course.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2002年第19期10-12,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 加速调强放疗 治疗 头颈部恶性肿瘤 临床研究 头颈部肿瘤 放射疗法 Simultaneous integrated boost with intensity modulated accelerated radiation therapy Head and neck Carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]Withers HR,Talor JMG,Macejewski B.The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy.Acta Oncol,1988,27:131~146.
  • 2[2]Horiot JC,Le Fur R,N'Guyen T,et al.Hyperfractionation versus conventional fractionation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: Final analysis of a randomized trial of the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol,1992,25:231~241.
  • 3[3]Emami B,Lyman J,Brown A,et al.Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic radiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1991,21:109~122.
  • 4[4]Eisbruch A,Ship JA,Martel MK,et al.Parotid gland sparing in patients undergoing bilateral head and neck irradiation: Techniques and early results.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1996,36:469~480.

同被引文献20

  • 1陈露,金凤,陈贡斌,李桂英.甘氨双唑钠对头颈部恶性肿瘤放疗增敏的近期疗效观察[J].山东医药,2009,49(52):81-82. 被引量:3
  • 2Bjarngard BE, Kijewski PK, Pashby C. Description of a computer controlled machine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1977, 2:142.
  • 3Uy NW, Woo SY, Teh BS, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for meningioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,53:1265-1270.
  • 4Fuss M, Salter BJ, Sadeghi A, et al. Fractionated stereotactic intensitymodulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT) for small acoustic neuromas. Med Dosim, 2002,27:147-154.
  • 5Butler EB, Teh BS, Grant WH, et al. SMART (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy ) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Iht J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999,45:21-32.
  • 6Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Tran BN, et al. Patterns of failures in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,55:312-321.
  • 7Pickett B, Vigneault E, Kurhanewicz J, et al. Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999, 44:921-929.
  • 8Xia P, Pickett B, Vigneault E, et al. Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatics lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 51:244-254.
  • 9Ma CM, Ding M, Li JS, et al. A comparative dosimetric study on tangential photon beams, intensity-modulated radiation (IMRT) and modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) for breast cancer treatment.Phys Med Biol, 2003,48:909-924.
  • 10Remouchamps VW, Vicini FA, Sharpe MB, et al. Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,55: 392-406.

引证文献2

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部