期刊文献+

双边交易模式下基于Aumann-Shapley值的阻塞费用分摊方法研究 被引量:32

A STUDY OF THE AUMANN-SHAPLEY VALUE BASED ALLOCATION METHOD FOR CONGESTION COST IN BILATERAL TRANSACTION ENVIRONMENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在阻塞管理中,费用分摊法已成为阻塞定价中的一种重要方法。然而在阻塞费用对阻塞线路的分摊中,目前提出的影子价格法和边际微增法仍存在一些不合理的地方。为了克服这些方法的缺点,该文针对双边交易提出了一种基于Aumann-Shapley值的阻塞费用分摊法。该方法利用无限多局中人联盟博弈中的Aumann-Shapley值,计及了所有阻塞消除顺序,通过Gauss积分法较为简单和精确地计算出分摊结果,真正实现了阻塞费用在阻塞线路上的公平分摊。通过算例分析,证明了基于Aumann-Shapley值的阻塞费用分摊法优于影子价格法和边际微增法。 In congestion management, the cost allocation methods have been one of the most important congestion pricing methods. Unfortunately in the congestion cost alloca-tion to congested lines, the shadow price method and the marginal and incremental method existed have some defects. This paper presents an Aumann-Shapley value based cost allocation method in bilateral transaction environment to overcome the shortcomings of these methods above. By means of the Aumann-Shapley value in the cooperative game with infinitely many players, the proposed method considers all orders of congestion relief and calculates the allocation simply and accurately using the Gauss Integration Method. The method equitably allocates the cost of relieving congestion to congested lines. Test results illustrate that the method provides better allocation than the shadow price method and the marginal and incremental method.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2002年第11期59-63,共5页 Proceedings of the CSEE
关键词 双边交易模式 Aumann-Shapley值 阻塞费用分摊方法 电力系统 congestion pricing cost allocation Aumann-Shapley value bilateral transaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Singh H,Hao S.Papalexopoulos A.Transmission congestion man-agement in competitive electricity markets[J].IEEE Trans.on Power System,1998,13(2):672-6 80.
  • 2Rosenberg A E.Congestion pricing or monopoly pricing[J].The Electricity Jo urnal,2000,13(3):33-41.
  • 3Rau N S.Transmission loss and congestion cost allocation-an approach based on responsibility[J].IEEE Trans.on Power System,2000,15(4):1401-1409.
  • 4Rudnick H,Palma R,Fernandez J E.Marginal pricing and supplement cost allo cation in transmission open access[J].IEEE Trans.on Power Systems,1995,10(2) :1125-1132.
  • 5Shirmohammadi D,Gribik P R,Law E T K,et al.Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions[J].IEEE Trans.on Power Systems.1 989.4(4):1405-1413.
  • 6Fradi A,Brignone S,Wollenberg B E.Calculation of energy transaction allocation factors[J].IEEE Trans. On Power Systems,2001,16(2):266-272.
  • 7Baran M E,Banunarayanan V,Garren K E.A Transaction assessment method for allocation of transmission services[J].IEEE Trans.on Power Systems,1999,14(3 ):920-928.
  • 8Jian Yang,Anderson M D.Tracing the flow of power in transmission networks for use-of-transmission-system charges and congestion man-agement[A].IEEE Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting [C].1999,1:399-405.
  • 9Baran M E,Banunarayanan V,Garren K E.Equitable allocation of congestion relief cost to transactions[J].IEEE Trans. On Power System,2000,15(2):579-585 .
  • 10Yeung C S K,Poon A S Y,Wu F F.Game theoretical multi-agent modelling of coalition formation for multilateral trades[J].IEEE Trans.on Power System,199 9,14(3):929-934.

同被引文献353

引证文献32

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部