摘要
本文从比较和分析的角度讨论了库恩和罗蒂在解释的合理性与认识论的合理性、可通约性与不可通约性以及对传统认识论关于“共同根基”构想的质疑方式等方面所存在的相同和差异之处。
From the standpoint of comparison and analysis,this article discusses the consensus and the disagreements between Kuhn's and Rorty's viewpoints of the interpretative rationality and the epistemological rationality,commensurable and incommensurable,and the query-way of the traditional epistemological conception concerning'common ground'.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第9期23-25,共3页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
