期刊文献+

增加载荷分享的动力椎弓根螺钉固定器的稳定性及其意义 被引量:10

Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing dynamic pedicle screw fixation device and its equivalent rigid device
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较增加载荷分享的动力椎弓根螺钉固定器 (dynamicdevice ,DD)与其相对的坚强固定器 (rigiddevice,RD)的稳定性 ,并探讨动力固定器的生物力学作用。 方法 在 7例新鲜成人尸体T10 L4脊柱标本 ,模拟L1骨折后安放DD和RD ,进行脊柱三维运动范围和前屈 压缩刚度测试。结果 DD与RD能在屈伸 ,侧弯运动方向上显著增加节段稳定性 ,使轴向旋转运动恢复至正常运动范围。DD比RD屈伸运动范围增加 4 0 % ,前屈 压缩刚度减少 2 4 1Nmm。 结论  2种脊柱内固定器均能稳定所损的脊柱 ,但动力椎弓根螺钉固定器的设计可在不牺牲脊柱固定稳定性的前提下 ,增加载荷分享 ,减少应力遮挡和应力集中 ,符合弹性固定原则。 Objectives To compare the stability of an enhanced load sharing dynamic pedicle screw fixation device with its equivalent rigid device and to evaluate biomechanical roles of the dynamic fixation. Methods A model of L 1 body fracture was produced on seven specimens of fresh adult cadaver spine from T 10 to L 4. Both dynamic and rigid devices were applied in the specimens to strength the injured level. Ranges of three dimensional movements and stiffness under flexion compression were measured in intact, injured and stabilized specimens. Results Both dynamic and rigid devices were found to provide significant stability for injured segment in flexion extension and lateral bending. In axial rotation, the devices could restore the stability to levels similar to those in an intact spine. Results indicated 40% increase in range of motion in flexion extension and 24 1 Nmm reduction in stiffness of flexion compression for dynamic device, compared with the rigid device. Conclusion The dynamic device offers a design that may enhance load sharing without sacrificing the stability and will decrease stress shielding and stress concentration.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第10期737-739,I001,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目 (3 990 60 )
关键词 动力椎弓根螺钉固定器 稳定性 脊柱损伤 骨折固定术 生物力学 Spinal injuries Fracture fixation, internal Internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Goel VK, Lim TH, Gwon J, et al. Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device:a comprehensive biomechanical investigation. Spine, 1991,16:S155-161.
  • 2Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. Spine, 1995, 20:526-531.
  • 3Kanayama M, Cunningham TM, Weis BC, et al. Maturation of the posterolateral spinal fusion and its effect on load-sharing of spinal instrumentation:an in vivo sheep model. J Bone and Joint Surg, 1997,79:1710-1720.
  • 4Shono Y,Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stibility of posterior of posteror spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine,1998,23:1550-1558.
  • 5Scifert JL, Sairyo K, Goel VK, et al. Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model. Spine, 1999,24:2206-2213.
  • 6Papp T, Porter R, Aspden R, et al. An in vitro study of the biomechanical effects of flexible stabilization on the lumbar spine. Spine, 1997,22:151-155.
  • 7Gertzbein SD, Betz R, Clements D, et al. Semirigid instrumentation in the management of lumbar spinal conditions combined with circumferential fusion: a multicenter study.Spine,1996,21:1918-1926.
  • 8McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, et al. Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine, 1989,14:9-14.

同被引文献80

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部