期刊文献+

多支血管病变患者冠状动脉内支架术疗效观察 被引量:2

Acute and long-term results after coronary stenting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究多支血管病变患者冠状动脉(冠脉)内支架术的近期疗效和远期预后。方法:1999年7月~2000年12月连续491例冠心病患者完成选择性冠脉内支架术,其中:单支病变(甲组)250例,多支病变不完全重建(乙组)175例,多支病变完全重建(丙组)66例,比较各组支架术近期及远期结果。结果:甲、乙、丙3组手术并发症发生率(5.6%、6.9%和9.1%)差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。平均随访时间(12±4.8)个月,随访率为92.3%。3组硝酸酯药物停用率(34.8%、31.9%和38.3%)、心功能改善率(54.3%、44.8%和50.O%)和再入院率(29.1%、38.0%和36.7%)差异均无显著性意义(均P>0.05)。与甲组比较,乙组心绞痛复发率(55.2%:39.1%)和心脏事件发生率(28.8%:17.8%)增高(均P<0.05),与甲组上述指标比较,丙组差异均无显著性意义(均P>0.05)。结论:多支血管病变患者冠脉内支架术安全,远期预后良好,病变血管完全血管重建则远期获益更大。 Objective: To investigate the acute results and long-term prognosis after coronary stenting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods: Four hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients who implanted selective coronary stent were divided into three groups. Group Ⅰ included 250 patients with single-vessel coronary stenting, group Ⅱ comprised 175 patients with incomplete multivessel coronary stenting and group Ⅲ contained 66 patients with complete multivessel coronary stenting. Acute results and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared among the three groups. Results: Procedural complication rate(5. 6% vs 6. 9% vs 9. 1%) were not significantly different among the three groups (all P >0. 05). Follow-up rate was 92. 3% (mean duration, 12 ± 4. 8 months). There wae no significant difference in nitrates cessation(34. 8% vs 31. 9% vs 38. 3%), improvement of cardiac function (54.3% vs 44. 8 % vs 50. 0 % ) and re-admission(29.1% vs38.0% vs36.7%) a-mong the three groups (all P > 0. 05). Compared with group Ⅰ, group Ⅱ patients had more recurrent angina (55.2% vs 39. 1%) and higher cardiac event rates (28. 8% vs17.8%) (all P<0. 05), however, these measurements did not significantly differ between group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ (all P >0. 05). Conclusion: Coronary stenting is safe and effective in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Furthermore, complete revascularization may bring better clinical improvement in long-term outcome in these patients.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第10期481-483,共3页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
关键词 多支血管病变 冠状动脉内支架术 疗效观察 介入治疗 冠心病 预后 Coronary disease Stenting, coronary Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Moussa I, Reimers B, Moses J, et al. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stenting. Circulation, 1997, 96: 873-879.
  • 2Kornowski R, Mehran R, Satler L F, et al. Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33: 420-426.
  • 3Serruys P W, Unger F, Sousa J E, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344: 1117-1124.
  • 4Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, et al. Argentine randomized study: Coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI Ⅱ): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 37: 51-58.
  • 5Faxon D P, Ghalilli K, Jacobs A K, et al. The degree of revascularization and outcome after multivessel coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J, 1992, 123(4 Pt 1): 854-859.
  • 6沈卫峰,吕安康,张建盛,张大东,张宪,郑爱芳.急性心肌梗塞时原发冠状动脉内支架植入术疗效研究[J].中国循环杂志,1999,14(2):67-69. 被引量:11
  • 7King S B Ⅲ, Lembo N J, Weintraub W S, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary surgery: Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST). N Engl J Med, 1994, 331: 1044-1050.
  • 8The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation(BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 217-225.
  • 9Kip K E, Bourassa M G, Jacobs A K, et al. Influence of pre-PTCA strategy and initial PTCA result in patients with multivessel disease: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation, 1999, 100: 910-917.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Shen W F,Am Heart J,1990年,119卷,525页

共引文献10

同被引文献19

  • 1陈灏珠.实用内科学(第10版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.1410-1413.
  • 2Burc GE, Giles TD, Colcolough HL. Ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J, 1970, 79:291 - 292.
  • 3Moussa I, Reimers B, Moses J, et al. Long - term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stenting. Circulation, 1997, 96:3873 - 3879.
  • 4Komowski R, Mehran R, Satler LF, et al. Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following mulfivessel coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33:420 - 426.
  • 5Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary - artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med,2001,344:1117 -1124.
  • 6Rodriguez A, Bemardi V, Navia J, et al. Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angloplasty with Stenting versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in patients with Multiple - Vessel Disease(ERACI Ⅱ) :30day and one - year follow - up results. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,37 :51 -58.
  • 7O'keefe JH Jr, Allan JJ, McCallister BD, et al. Angioplasty versus bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%. Am J Cardiol, 1993,71:897 -901.
  • 8Vandormael MG, Chaitman BR, Ischinger T, et al. Immediate and short - term benefit of multilesion coronary angioplasty: influence of degree of revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985, 6:983 -991.
  • 9Bourassa MG, Holubkov R, Yeh W, et al. Strategy of complete revascularization in patients with muhivessel coronary artery disease (a report from the 1985 - 1986 NHLBI PTCA Registry). Am J Cardiol, 1992, 70:174 - 178.
  • 10Kip KE, Bourassa MG, Jacohs AK, et al. Influence of pre - PTCA strategy and initial PTCA result in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation, 1999, 100:910-917.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部