对孙瀛洲先生一个鉴瓷结论的修正

The correction for a conclustion of appreciating poreclains made by Mr.Sun Yingzhou

“吾爱吾师,吾更爱真理。”——古希腊·亚里士多德2002年3月末,我在景德镇仿古瓷高手王文宪先生的作坊访问学习时,无意间顺手拿起案台上一只已烧成的,写有“大清乾隆年制”6字3行篆书青花款的白色浅腹碗,看到碗外壁“修胎痕”十分明显,约一指宽的“刀痕”一棱一棱地从近圈足处盘旋而上,至近口沿处方才消失。我问王先生:“这只碗为什么修胎如此粗糙?”王先生笑答:“那不是修胎痕,是拉坯痕。是学徒练手艺做的碗,因为拉坯手法不熟练,修胎、补水后看似光圆,烧成后就成这个样子。”我大惑不解,过去从诸多专家的著述中,从自己收集到的唐、宋、元、明以来众多窑口、众多品种的碗的标本中,都学到过并且认定这种出现在碗外壁的旋痕是“修胎痕”,而且还认为宋以前“高古瓷(老窑瓷)”的“

There was a connected mark for every big piece of porcelain in making a piece of porcelain.In Ming and Qing Dynasties,the connected mark of porcelain in Ming Dynasty was obvious than that in Qing Dynasty.The author in this paper pointed out that the key of the reason of the produce for the connected mark of a piece of porcelain was due to the making its blank,but not the repairing its blank.