4Evaluating Federal Research Programms: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act [M]. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
5J. Van Raan. 1996. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises [J]. Scientometrics, vol. 36: 397-420.
6Experiments in International Benchmarking of US Research Fields: Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy[M!. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000.
7Evaluation: Die Verfahren der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft[M]. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 2002.
8Simon Wessely. Peer Review of grant applications: What do we know? [J]. The lancet, 1998, 352: 301-305.
4Evaluating Federal Research Programms: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act [M]. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
5J. Van Raan. 1996. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises [J]. Scientometrics, vol. 36: 397-420.
6Experiments in International Benchmarking of US Research Fields: Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy[M!. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000.
7Evaluation: Die Verfahren der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft[M]. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 2002.
8Simon Wessely. Peer Review of grant applications: What do we know? [J]. The lancet, 1998, 352: 301-305.
