期刊文献+

“认知税”:贫困研究的新进展 被引量:15

Cognitive Tax: Recent progress of poverty research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "认知税"是贫困情境对决策过程中认知资源的损耗,也是贫困者短视、缺乏追求以及对机会不敏感,进而陷入持续贫困、代际贫困的重要原因。本文总结了"认知税"概念的理论基础、"认知税"的贫困形成机制以及"认知税"视角下的扶贫干预建议。文章指出非理性决策认知三原则是"认知税"贫困解读的理论基础,认知资源消耗、贫困思维模式与社会资本税缴纳是"认知税"视角下贫困的成因,而最小化认知资源消耗、改变贫困思维模式和重视社会环境的影响则是"认知税"视角对扶贫干预的贡献。 Cognitive Tax refers to the wear and tear of cognitive resources that arises in the context of poverty indecision-making, and is caused by the short sight, lack of pursuits, and insensitivity to opportunities of the poor, whichfurther lead to constant and intergenerational poverty. The present essay summarizes the theoretical basis of CognitiveTax and the mechanism of poverty formation, hence putting forward corresponding suggestion of designing interventionmeasures to reduce poverty under the perspective of Cognitive Tax. The results show that the three cognitive principlesof irrational decision-making, which are the very theoretical basis of concept of Cognitive Tax, include the cognitiveresources consumption, the poor cognition frame and the social capital tax, which are the three causes of poverty. Lastly,minimizing the wear and tear of Cognitive Tax, avoiding poor frames and taking account of social context’s influenceare considered to be the intervention suggestions contributed by the Cognitive Tax.
作者 丁建军 DING Jianjun(School of Business, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China;The Collaborative Innovation Center of Poverty Alleviation and Development in Wuling Mountain Area, Jishou 416000, China)
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第3期152-158,210,共8页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 国家自科基金项目"武陵山片区多维贫困空间格局与形成机理研究"(41361030) 国家社科基金项目"武陵山片区扶贫多维瞄准绩效评价和优化研究"(13CJY078) 湖南省社科基金项目"武陵山片区新型城镇化驱动机制与路径研究"(14YBA311)
关键词 “认知税” 贫困情境 持续贫困 扶贫干预 Cognitive Tax context of poverty constant poverty poverty intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1World Bank Group. World Development Report (2015): Mind,Society and Behavior [M]. Durham: Duke University Press,2014: 23.
  • 2Mullainathan, Sendhil, Eldar Shafir. Scarcity: Why Having TooLittle Means So Much [M]. New York: Times Books, 2013: 146.
  • 3Appadurai, Arjun. The capacity to aspire: culture and the termsof recognition [C]// Vijayendra Rao and Michael Walton. Cultureand Public Action.Washington, DC: World Bank; Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press, 2004: 77.
  • 4Banerjee, Abhijit, and Sendhil Mullainathan. Limited attentionand income distribution [J]. American Economic Review, 2008,98(2): 489-493.
  • 5Narayan, Deepa, Lant Pritchett, etc. Moving Out of Poverty:Success from the Bottom Up [M]. Washington, DC: World Bankand Palgrave Macmillan, 2009:45.
  • 6Perova, Elizaveta, and Renos Vakis. Improving gender anddevelopment outcomes through agency: Policy lessons fromthree peruvian experiences [R]. Report 79713. Washington, DC:World Bank, 2013.
  • 7Bettinger, Eric P. Bridget Terry Long, Philip Oreopoulos, etc.The role of application assistance and information in collegedecisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA Experiment [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012, 127(3): 1205.1242.
  • 8Duflo, Esther, Michael Kremer, etc. Nudging farmers to usefertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya [J].American Economic Review, 2011, 101(6): 2350-2390.
  • 9Beaman, Lori, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, etc. Powerfulwomen: Does exposure reduce bias [J]. Quarterly Journal ofEconomics 2009, 124(4): 1497-1540.
  • 10Beaman, Lori, Esther Duflo, etc. Female leadership raisesaspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policyexperiment in India [J]. Science, 2012, 335(6068): 582-586.

同被引文献215

引证文献15

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部