化学三重表征在复习课上的应用被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要化学三重表征分别是:宏观表征、微观表征和符号表征。近10年来,化学三重表征逐步进入我国中学化学课堂,帮助教师引导学生进行化学知识的意义建构。但是由于其引进时间不长,仍存在一些理解上的偏差,本文利用三重表征架构分析高中复习课常见问题,并提出针对性建议。

作者刘琳琳杨天林

机构地区宁夏大学化学化工学院

出处《教育教学论坛》 2016年第35期172-175,共4页 Education And Teaching Forum

关键词三重表征高中化学复习课

分类号 G427 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1[德]马克斯·韦伯(Max·Weber).韩水法,莫茜,译.社会科学方法论[M].商务印书馆,2015.
2A.L.Chandrasegaran,David F.Treagust,Mauro Mocerino. AnEvaluation of a Teaching Intervention to Promote Students’Abilityto Use Multiple Levels of RepresentationWhen Describingand Explaining Chemical Reactions [J].Res Sci Educ,2008,(38):237–248.
3Talanquer. Macro,Submicro,and Symbolic:The many facesof the chemistry“triplet”[J].International Journal of Science Education,2011,33(2):179-195.
4[德]康德(I·Kant).任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学导论[M].庞景仁,译.商务印书馆,1997.
5张丙香,毕华林.化学三重表征的含义及其教学策略[J].中国教育学刊,2013(2):73-76. 被引量：72
6高永.基于“90后”大学生思想特点的“概论”课情境教学模式探索[J].思想教育研究,2015(9):57-60. 被引量：8
7Corradi,D.J.Elen,G.Clarebout. Understanding and Enhancingthe Use of Multiple ExternalRepresentatio-ns in ChemistryEducation [J].Journal of Science Edu-cation and Technology,2012,21(6):780-795.
8仇晓春.概念框架的内涵与建构——以教育技术研究为例[J].电化教育研究,2015,36(10):20-25. 被引量：3
9Aykac. An Application Regarding the Availability of MindMaps in Visual Art Education Based on Acti-ve LearningMethod [J].International Conference on New Horizons in Education,2015,(174):1859-1866.

二级参考文献26

1A. L. Chandrasegaran,David F. Treagust,Mauro Mocerino.An Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention to Promote Students’ Ability to Use Multiple Levels of Representation When Describing and Explaining Chemical Reactions[J].Research in Science Education.2008(2)
2A.H.Johnstone.The Development of Chemistry Teaching; A Chang Response to Changing Demand[].Journal of Chemical Education.1993
3National Research Council.The National Science Education Standards[]..1996
4VICENTE TALANQUER.Macro,submicro,and symbol-ic:The many faces of the chemistry"triplet"[].Interna-tional Journal of Science Education.2011
5Januszewski,A., & Molenda, M.Educational Technology : A Definition with Commentary[M].New York : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2007.
6Leshem, S., & Trafford, V.N.Overlooking the Conceptual Framework [J]. Innovations in Educational and Teaching International, 2007,44 (1) :93-105.
7Ravitch,S.M,& Riggan, M. Reason and Rigor:How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2012.
8Avis, J.Work-Based Knowledge, Evidence-Informed Practice and Education[J].British Journal of Education Studies, 2003,51 (4) : 369-389.
9DeBacker,T.K., Crowson, H.M., Beesley,A.D.,Thoma, S.J., & Hestevold, N.L. The Challenge of Measuring Epistemic Beliefs : An Analysis of Three Self-Report Instruments[J]. Journal of Experimental Education, 2008, 76 (3) : 281-312.
10Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. The Ontology of Concepts-Abstract Objects or Mental Representations?[J].Nous, 2007,41 (4) :561-593.