期刊文献+

标杆型3D打印导板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根置钉准确度分析 被引量:15

Accuracy assessment of a 3D printed navigational guiding template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨标杆型3D打印导板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根置钉的可行性,并进行置钉准确度分析。方法2014年6月一2015年8月,本院收治寰枢椎脱位患者21例,男12例,女9例;年龄12~54岁,平均42.6岁。术前使用Mimics 17.0软件和3-matic 9.0软件为每例患者制作标杆型3D打印导板,术中使用标杆型3D打印导板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根置钉,术后患者行颈椎CT平扫。在Mimics 17.0软件中,将手术前后的寰枢椎模型及螺钉配对拟合,调整空间坐标轴,测量并比较术前预设钉道与术后实际钉道的内倾角、头倾角、进钉点坐标。结果21例患者手术顺利,手术时间( 193 ± 51 ) min,术中出血量( 384 ±127) mL。共置人寰椎椎弓根螺钉30枚,枢椎椎弓根螺钉42枚。除2 枚寰椎椎弓根螺钉侵人椎管矣2 mm外,其他螺钉均位于椎弓根骨皮质内。寰椎左右侧预设最佳钉道内倾角度分别为9.4。± 1.8。、9.8。± 1.6。,实际钉道内倾角度分别为8.7。± 1.6。、10.6。±2.2。;左右侧预设最佳钉道头倾角度分别为8.9。±2.5。、8.8。±2.3。,实际钉道头倾角度分别为9.3。±2.9。、9.4。±3.5。〇枢椎左右侧预设最佳钉道内倾角度分别为21.9。±6.6。、22.4。±6.9。,左右侧实际钉道内倾角度分别为24.1。± 6.3。、20.8。± 6.4。;左右侧预设最佳钉道头倾角度分别为23.7。± 7.3。、24.2。± 7.2。,左右侧实际钉道头倾角度分别为22.1° ± 7.9°、22.3° ± 7.6°。寰枢椎术后实际钉道与术前预设最佳钉道的内倾角、头倾角、进钉点坐标差异均无统计学意义(P > 〇.〇5 )。结论标杆型3D打印导板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根置钉方向可调整性好,置钉准确度较高,为临床寰枢椎置钉提供了一种新的方法。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of establishing a 3D printed navigational template for atlantoaxialpedicle screw placement, and assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Methods From June 2014 to August 2015,clinical data of 21 cases with atlantoaxial dislocation were analyzed. There were 12 males and 9 females with a mean age of42.6 ( range, 12-54 ) years old. Preoperatively, 3D printed navigational template with 2 guide rods was designed for everypatient using the Mimics 17.0 and 3-Matic 9.0 software. The 3D printed navigational template with 2 guide rods was used foratlantoaxial pedicle screw placement during operation. Postoperatively, all the patients took CT scan of cervical vertebrae.In the Mimics 17.0 software, pre- and post-operative trajactories and entry points of pedicle screws were measured aftermatching the positions of preoperative and postoperative 3D atlantoaxial models in a redefining coordinate. Results Allthe 21 patients underwent the surgeries successfully, with operation time of ( 193 ± 51 ) min and blood loss of ( 384 土127 ) mL. In total, 30 pedicle screws were placed for the atlas, and 42 for axis. There were 2 screws for atlas protruded intothe spinal canal within 2 mm. Transverse angle of ideal screw trajectories for atlantal pedicle screws measured 9.40 ± 1.80on the left and 9.8° ± 1.6° on the right, and actual screw trajectories measured 8.7° ± 1.6° and 10.6° ± 2.2°, respectively. Sagittal angle of ideal screw trajectories for atlantal pedicle screws measured 8.90 ± 2.50 on the left and 8.80 ± 2.30 on the right, andactual screw trajectories measured 9会30 ± 2.90 and 9.40 ± 3.50, respectively. Transverse angle of ideal screw trajectories for axialpedicle screws measured 21.90 ± 6.60 on the left and 22.40 ± 6.90 on the right, and actual screw trajectories measured 24.10 土6会3〇 and 20.8〇 ± 6.4〇, respectively. Sagittal angle of ideal screw trajectories for axial pedicle screws measured ± 7.3〇 onthe left and 24.2° ± 7.20 on the right, and actual screw trajectories measured 22.1° ± 7.9° and 22.30 ± 7.60, respectively. Therewere no statistically significant differences in the deviation of either screw orientation or entry point location between ideal andactual screw trajectories ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion Using this 3D printed navigational template for atlantoaxial pedicle screwplacement, surgeons could change screw direction based on the template, and provide a high accuracy of screw placement.
作者 姜良海 谭明生 董亮 杨峰 移平 唐向盛 韦竑宇 王威 JIANG Liang-hai;TAN Ming-sheng;DONG Liang;YANG Feng;YI Ping;TANG Xiang-sheng;WEI Hong-yu;WANG Wei(Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;Graduate School, Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;Department of Spine Surgery, Xian Red Cross Hospital, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China)
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2016年第4期205-210,共6页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
基金 北京市科委首都临床特色课题(Z141107002514058)
关键词 寰椎 枢椎 脱位 骨螺丝 计算机模拟 计算机辅助设计 成像 三维 Atlas Axis Dislocations Bone screws Computer simulation Computer-aided design Imaging, three-dimensional
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Lee MJ, Cassinelli E , Riew KD. The feasibility of inserting atlaslateral mass screws via the posterior arch [J]. Spine ( Phila Pa1976), 2006 , 31(24): 2798-2801.
  • 2Tan M, Wang H , Wang Y , et al. Morphometric evaluation ofscrew fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass [J].Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2003, 28( 9 ): 888-895.
  • 3Yeom J S, Kafle D, Nguyen NQ, et al. Routine insertion ofthe lateral mass screw via the posterior arch for Ci fixation:feasibility and related complications [J]. Spine J, 2012, 12( 6 ): 476483.
  • 4谭明生,张光铂,李子荣,王慧敏,移平,韦竤宇,杨峰,梁立.寰椎测量及其经后弓侧块螺钉固定通道的研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(1):5-8. 被引量:249
  • 5Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch J J, et al. Cl anatomy anddimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement[J]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2007, 32( 8 ): 844-848.
  • 6Elliott R E" Tanweer 0 , Frempong-Boadu A , et al. Impact ofstarting point and C2 nerve status on the safety and accuracy of Gilateral mass screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature[J] .J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015, 2 8 (5 ): 171-185.
  • 7Pan J, Ii L, Qian L, et al. Cl lateral mass screw insertion withprotection of Ci-C2 venous sinus: technical note and review ofthe literature[J] . Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2010, 35 ( 21 ):E1133-E1136.
  • 8Gebauer M, Barvencik F , Briem D , et al. Evaluation of anatomiclandmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via theposterior arch[J]. Eur Spine J , 2010, 19 (1): 85-90.
  • 9Jian FZ, Chen Z, Wrede KH, et al. Direct posterior reductionand fixation for the treatment of basilar invagination withatlantoaxial dislocation[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66 ( 4 ):678-687.
  • 10Song GC, Cho KS, Yoo DS, et al. Surgical treatm ent ofcraniovertebral junction instability: clinical outcomes andeffectiveness in personal experience[J]. J Korean NeurosurgSoc, 2010, 48(1 ): 37-45.

二级参考文献34

共引文献343

同被引文献151

引证文献15

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部