无保护会阴接生法与保护会阴接生法的临床应用比较

Clinical application comparison of delivery method without perineal protection and delivery method with perineal protection

目的:探讨保护会阴接生法和无保护会阴接生法的临床应用。方法:收治分娩产妇87例,随机分为对照组和试验组,试验组采用无保护会阴接生法,对照组采用保护会阴接生法,比较分娩结局和产妇情况。结果:在试验组,会阴Ⅰ度裂伤率高于对照组,Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度裂伤率及会阴感染率和水肿率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用无保护会阴接生可减少产妇伤害及会阴损伤率,效果显著。

Objective:To explore the clinical application of delivery method without perineal protection and delivery method withperineal protection.Methods:87 delivery women were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and theexperimental group.The experimental group was given delivery method without perineal protection.The control group was givendelivery method with perineal protection.We compared the outcome of childbirth and maternal condition.Results:In theexperimental group,the rate of Ⅰ degree perineal laceration was higher than that in the control group;Ⅱ degree and Ⅲ degreelaceration rate and the rate of perineal infection and edema were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The delivery method without perineal protection can reduce maternal injury and the rate of perineal injury.The effectis significant.