期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及经阴道分娩安全性的临床分析 被引量:9

Clinical analysis of delivery choice of pregnancy with uterine scar and safety of vaginal delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及经阴道分娩的安全性。方法:收治瘢痕子宫产妇364例,分为阴道试产组与剖宫产组,比较两组效果。结果:80例产妇实施阴道试产,成功72例,成功率90%,其余292例产妇实施剖宫产术。阴道试产组平均出血量、住院时间均优于剖宫产组(P<0.05)。结论:在明确评估和掌握产妇阴道分娩指征基础上,全面监测产妇阴道分娩过程,能够提升阴道分娩的有效性与安全性。 Objective:To explore the delivery choice of pregnancy with uterine scar and safety of vaginal delivery.Methods:364 cases of pregnant women with uterine scar were selected.They were divided into the successful vaginal delivery group and the cesarean section group.We compared the effect of the two groups.Results:80 cases of pregnant women were given vaginal delivery.72 cases were successful,and the success rate was 90%.The remaining 292 cases received cesarean section.In the vaginal delivery group,the average amount of bleeding and hospitalization time were better than the cesarean section group(P<0.05).Conclusion:On the basis of clear assessment and grasp of the indications of vaginal delivery,comprehensive monitoring of vaginal delivery process can improve the efficacy and safety of vaginal delivery.
作者 凌萍 Ling Ping(The Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Qingzhen City 551400)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第23期16-16,18,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再次妊娠分娩方式 经阴道分娩 Uterine scar Delivery choice of repregnancy Vaginal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1应豪,段涛.剖宫产后再次妊娠的流行病学调查[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):260-261. 被引量:173
  • 2张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:262
  • 3张坚,李萍,谢静燕,徐友娣,玄英华.5年剖宫产手术指征变迁的因素分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):60-61. 被引量:137
  • 4谭毅,谢平,陈雪梅.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2007,18(2):123-124. 被引量:17
  • 5Qureshi B, Inafuku K, Oshima K, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2007, 183(1): 55-65.
  • 6Leung GM, Lam TH, Wang I, et al. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Caesarean section rates in Hang Kang[ J]. BMJ, 2002,324 (7335) :486.
  • 7Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, et al. Induction of labor: compari- son of a cohort with uterine sear from previouseesarean section vs. a co- hort with intact uterus [J].J Materu Fetal Neonatal Med, 2006,19 (8) : 471 - 475.
  • 8Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients ofprevious cesarean section [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2004,87 ( 3 ) :215 - 219.
  • 9LUMBIGANON P, LAOPAIBOON M, GIILMEZOGLU AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J]. Lancet,2010, 375(9713): 490-499.
  • 10MACONES GA, PEIPERT J, NELSON DB, et al. Maternal com- plications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a muhicenter study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(5): 1656-1662.

共引文献134

同被引文献76

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部