期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术不同麻醉方法的临床疗效分析 被引量:6

Clinical curative effect analysis of different anesthesia methods in laparoscopic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析腹腔镜手术患者的麻醉方法和效果。方法:收治腹腔镜手术患者100例,随机分为对照组和试验组各50例。对照组给予静吸全身麻醉,试验组给予硬膜外阻滞+静吸全身麻醉。观察麻醉效果,比较心率、血压指标变化和苏醒时间。结果:试验组、对照组麻醉优良率分别为100%、94%。试验组不良反应发生率明显低于对照组,建立气腹后、术毕的心率和血压指标低于对照组,自主呼吸、苏醒、拔管时间少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:针对腹腔镜手术患者,硬膜外阻滞复合静吸全身麻醉效果更佳,呼吸循环稳定、苏醒快、不良反应少。 Objective:To analyze the anesthesia methods and effects of patients with laparoscopic surgery.Methods:100 patients with laparoscopic surgery were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group with 50 cases in each.The control group was given intravenous general anesthesia.The experimental group was given epidural anesthesia and intravenous general anesthesia.The effect of anesthesia was observed,and the changes of heart rate,blood pressure and the recovery time were compared.Results:The excellent rate of anesthesia in the experimental group and the control group were 100% and 94% respectively.The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group.The heart rate and blood pressure index after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum and operation were lower than those of the control group,the times of spontaneous breathing, waking up,tube drawing were less than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:For patients with laparoscopic surgery,the epidural anesthesia combined with intravenous general anesthesia effect is better;the respiratory circulation is stable;the waking up is fast;the adverse reaction is less.
作者 丁兆永 秦彦芹 Ding Zhaoyong;Qin Yanqin(Lanshan District People's Hospital of Rizhao City,Shandong Province 276807)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第23期96-96,98,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 腹部手术 腹腔镜 麻醉方案 不良反应 Abdominal operation Laparoscope Anesthesia methods Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

共引文献28

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部