对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果

Comparative analysis of the clinical effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compression pump in the treatment of children asthma

目的:比较空气压缩泵雾化吸入与氧驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床疗效。方法:收治哮喘患儿70例,均行雾化吸入治疗,依据雾化装置划分为两组,对照组35例行空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,观察组35例行氧驱动雾化吸入治疗,对比两组临床效果。结果:对照组临床总有效率74.3%,低于观察组的94.3%(P<0.05)。结论:氧驱动雾化吸入相较于空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘临床效果更优。

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compression pump in the treatment of children asthma.Methods:70 patients with asthma were selected.All were treated with aerosol inhalation.According to the atomization device they were divided into two groups.35 cases in the control group were treated by air compressor pump atomizing inhalation.35 cases in the observation group were treated with oxygen driven atomizing inhalation.The clinical effect of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of the control group was 74.3%,lower than 94.3% of the observation group(P < 0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of oxygen driven atomizing inhalation in treatment of children asthma is better than that of air compression pump.