期刊文献+

不同出血量采用小骨窗开颅与常规骨瓣开颅治疗高血压脑出血临床对比研究 被引量:7

Clinical comparative study of small bone flap craniotomy and conventional bone flap craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage with different amount of bleeding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同出血量采用小骨窗开颅与常规骨瓣开颅治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果。方法:收治高血压脑出血患者96 例,分为A 组(小骨窗开颅术)及B 组(常规骨瓣开颅术),比较两组的治疗效果。结果:A 组手术时间、术中输血量及住院时间明显优于B 组(P<0.05),A 组发生切口脑脊液漏的概率明显低于B 组(P<0.05)。当出血量在30~60 mL 时,两组治疗总有效率分别为83.33%及83.33%,治疗效果基本相同(P>0.05),当出血量为60~80 mL 时,两组治疗总有效率分别为60.00%及79.17%,A 组治疗效果明显低于B 组(P<0.05)。结论:对高血压脑出血患者进行治疗,应根据患者具体病情选择合适的治疗方法,对出血量较多的患者采用常规骨瓣开颅治疗,以提高治疗效果;对出血量较少的患者采用小骨窗开颅治疗,在保证治疗效果基本不变的情况下,减少患者并发症及治疗时间。 Objective:To explore the clinical effect of small bone flap craniotomy and conventional bone flap craniotomy in thetreatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage with different amount of bleeding.Methods:96 patients with hypertensive cerebralhemorrhage were selected.They were divided into the A group(small bone flap craniotomy) and the B group(conventional bone flapcraniotomy),and we compared the treatment effect of two groups.Results:In the A group,operation time,intraoperative bloodtransfusion volume and hospital stay were significantly better than the B group(P<0.05).In the A group,the probability of CSFleakage was significantly lower than the B group(P<0.05).When the amount of bleeding was 30 to 60 mL,the total effective rate ofthe two groups was 83.33% and 83.33% respectively,and the treatment effect was basically the same(P>0.05).When the amountof bleeding was 60 to 80 mL,the total effective rate of the two groups was 60% and 79.17% respectively,and the effect of A groupwas significantly lower than that of B group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients,weshould choose the appropriate treatment according to the specific condition of the patient.For patients with high blood loss,we canuse conventional bone flap craniotomy,in order to improve the treatment effect.For patients with a lower amount of hemorrhage,weshould choose small bone flap craniotomy,on the basis of ensuring the treatment effect,which can reduce the complications andtreatment time.
作者 易明亮 Yi Mingliang(The Department of Neurosurgery,the Third People's Hospital of Yibin City 644000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第14期14-16,共3页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 出血量 小骨窗开颅 常规骨瓣开颅 脑出血 Amount of bleeding Small bone flap craniotomy Conventional bone flap craniotomy Cerebral hemorrhage
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1王德江,王硕,赵元立,康帅,王梅,刘克军,赵继宗.高血压脑出血外科治疗近期预后多因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(44):3118-3122. 被引量:91
  • 2马向科,胡永峰,师蔚,朱宏伟,刘重霄,周任,高李贵,周乐,孙建军,王睿智,宋英.高血压脑出血不同术式治疗疗效的回顾性研究[J].中华神经医学杂志,2007,6(1):58-60. 被引量:62
  • 3姜之全,张少军,娄飞云.高血压脑出血超早期手术的疗效分析[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2007,15(8):583-585. 被引量:22
  • 4Hall CE,Grotta JC.Ncw era for management ofprimary hypertensivcinU'acenebral hcmorr-hagc[J].Curt Ncuro Neurosic Rep,2005;5(1):29 - 35.
  • 5Ronning P, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P, et al.Aspects of intracerebral hematomas-an update[J].2008, 118(6):347-361.
  • 6Li N, Liu YF, Ma L, et al.Association of molecular markers with perihematomal edema and clinical outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Stroke, 2013, 44(3):658-663.
  • 7Mirsen T.Acute treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Curr Treat Options Neurol, 2010, 12(6):504-517.
  • 8Shimamura N, Munakata A, Naraoka M, et al.Decompressive hemi-craniectomy is not necessary to rescue supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage patients:consecutive single-center experience[J].Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011, 111:415-419.
  • 9Bhatia R, Singh H, Singh S, et al.A prospective study of in-hospital mortality and discharge outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Neurol India, 2013, (3):244-248.
  • 10Takeuchi S, Takasato Y, Masaoka H, et al.Decompressive craniectomy with hematoma evacuation for large hemispheric hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2013, 118:277-279.

共引文献65

同被引文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部