软通道微创介入治疗颅内血肿86例的体会

Experience of minimally invasive interventional treatment with soft channel for intracranial hematoma in 86 cases

目的:探讨软通道微创介入术治疗颅内血肿的临床效果。方法:收治颅内血肿患者86例,随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组采用软通道微创介入疗法,对照组采取硬通道微创介入疗法,比较两组的治疗效果。结果:两组患者的血肿清除情况、再出血率和日常生活能力的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组并发症发生率显著低于对照组,QOL分数显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:软通道微创介入术治疗颅内血肿同硬通道相比,两者疗效的差异无统计学意义,然而软通道微创介入疗法并发症概率较低,可有效提升颅内血肿患者的生存质量。

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of minimally invasive interventional treatment with soft channel forintracranial hematoma.Methods:86 patients with intracranial hematoma were selected.They were randomly divided into theobservation group and the control group.The observation group was treated with minimally invasive interventional treatment withsoft channel.The control group was treated with minimally invasive interventional treatment with hard channel.We compared thetreatment effect of two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in the rate of hematoma removal,the bleeding rate andthe daily living ability of two groups(P>0.05).In the observation group,the incidence of complications was significantly lower thanthe control group,and the QOL score was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with hardchannel,the clinical effect of minimally invasive interventional treatment with soft channel for intracranial hematoma was similar,however,the complication rate of minimally invasive interventional treatment with soft channel was lower,which can effectivelyimprove the quality of life of patients with intracranial hematoma.