期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩36例治疗体会 被引量:1

Treatment experience of 36 cases of re-pregnancies in scarred uterus with vaginal delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的结局。方法:收治瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇72例,分为两组。对照组采用剖宫产,研究组采用阴道分娩,比较两组分娩结局及并发症发生情况。结果:研究组分娩时间、出血量、住院时间优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组成功阴道分娩26例(72.2%),对照组剖宫产分娩率100.0%。结论:瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇阴道分娩并发症发生率较低,妊娠结局较好。 Objective:To analyze the outcome of vaginal delivery for re-pregnancies in scarred uterus.Methods:72 cases of women with re-pregnancies in scarred uterus were divided into two groups.The control group adopted cesarean section,and the research group adopted vaginal delivery.The outcomes and complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The delivery time,blood loss,hospital stays in the research group were better than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the research group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).26 cases in the research group had successful vaginal delivery(72.2%) and the cesarean delivery rate in the control group was 100% .Conclusion:The incidence of complications of vaginal delivery in women with re-pregnancies in scarred uterus was lower,and the outcome of pregnancy was better.
作者 徐丽辉 Xu Lihui(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the People's Hospital of Yuanyang County in Honghe Prefecture,Yunnan Province 662400)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2016年第26期44-45,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再次妊娠 阴道分娩 Scarred uterus Re-pregnancy Vaginal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1李彦军,吴俊改.剖宫产后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2007,6(3):50-52. 被引量:20
  • 2Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect : correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,34( 1 ):85-89.
  • 3Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM, et al. Method of deliv- ery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on ma- ternal and perinatal health 2007-08 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) : 4490 -4491.
  • 4Allomuvor GF, Xue M, Zhu X, et al. The definition, aetiology, presen- tation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects [ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33 (8) :759-763.
  • 5Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, et al. Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery[ J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ,2012,41 ( 8 ) :708-726.
  • 6Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, et al. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo- natal outcomes in future pregnancies[J]. J Periuatol,2009,29( 11 ) : 726-730.
  • 7Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in an inner-city hospital in Lagos, Nigeria [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (2) :135-139.
  • 8Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographie evaluation of the lower uterine segment[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,201 (3) :320.
  • 9Xirasagar S,Lin HC,Liu TC. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan[J].Health Policy and Planning,2006,(04):319-325.doi:10.1093/heapol/czl015.
  • 10陈建林.剖宫产后再次足月妊娠分娩方式的临床探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2008,2(23):119-120. 被引量:8

共引文献298

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部