期刊文献+

经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的可行性分析 被引量:8

The feasibility analysis of tranasnal minimally invasive surgical treatment for rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价经肛门微创手术(transanalminimallyinvasivesurgery,TAMIS)临床疗效,以期为患者提供更好的手术方式选择。方法 回顾性分析2012年7月至2014年9月间在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院结直肠肿瘤外科接受直肠肿物局部切除术患者52例,其中TAMIS组30例,传统经肛门切除组(TAE)22例,对患者进行系统随访,并详细记录其临床资料。结果 TAMIS组手术患者平均手术时间41.5(25~90)分钟。平均住院时间3(1~4)天。SILSPort平均安装时间3(1~5)分钟,TAE组手术患者平均手术时间55(25~110)分钟。平均住院时间3(1~4)天。52例患者手术均获得完整切除,未见切缘阳性患者。共发生术后短期内肛门括约肌功能异常1例,术后尿潴留1例,术后肛门出血1例。两组患者肿物距离肛缘距离方面差异有显著的统计学意义,TAMIS术能够获得更为广泛的手术范围;TAMIS组手术时间更短(41.5分钟,P<0.05);在肛门功能影响方面,TAMIS组患者便失禁严重程度评分下降明显(P=0.002),肛门功能恢复良好;患者术后疼痛强度评分低于TAE手术组(P=0.001),经过数学分析得到TAMIS曲线公式为Y=-13.15ln(x)+79.563。根据手术时间二次求导曲线图,第12例为拐点,提示前12例为学习阶段。结论 经肛门微创可通过常规腹腔镜器械完成,手术学习曲线平滑,易于掌握,肛门功能损伤小,术后疼痛轻微,手术范围广,术野清晰,在直肠良性肿物或早期直肠癌的局部切除中具有良好的疗效。 Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of the transanal minimally invasivesurgery (TAMIS), is aiming to provide a better surgical procedure for patients. Methods Retrospectiveanalysis of 52 cases of patients with colorectal neoplasm local resection from July 2012 to September 2014in the department of colorectal surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. 30cases were TAMIS group, 22 cases were TAE group. All the patients were followed up, and recorded detailclinical data. Results In TAMIS group, the average operation time was 41.5 minutes (25~90), the averagelength of hospital stay was 3 days (1~4), and setup time of SILS Port was 3 minutes on average (1~5). Theaverage operation time of TAE group was 55 minutes (25~110), and the average length of hospital stay was3 days (1~4). 52 cases were obtained complete resection, with no positive cut edge. Of all the patients, 1 casewas with anal sphincter dysfunction, 1 case was with urinary retention shortly after the postoperation, 1 casewas with postoperative anal bleeding. The difference of distance from neoplasm to anal edge was of statistical significance in two groups of patients, TAMIS technique can get wider operation range, and TAMIS group has shorter operation time(41.5 minutes, P < 0.05); In terms of anal function, the score of fecal incontinence in TAMIS group was significantly decreased(P=0.002), anal function recovered well; The intensity score of postoperative pain was lower than TAE group (P=0.001), TAMIScurve formula was Y=-13.15 ln (x) + 79.563 after mathematical analysis. According to operation time, the 12th case was inflectionpoint in the second derivative curve, indicating the previous 12 cases were the learning phase. Conclusions Transanal minimallyinvasive surgery can be finished by conventional laparoscopic instruments, the learning curve is smooth, and easy to master, withsmaller anus function damage, mild postoperative pain, wide scope of operation and clear operation field, which was of good curativeeffect in the treatment of benign neoplasm or local excision of early rectal cancer.
作者 徐永鹏 王锡山 Xu Yongpeng;Wang Xishan(Department of Urinary Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China;Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China)
出处 《中华结直肠疾病电子杂志》 2016年第1期33-39,共7页 Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81272706)
关键词 肛管 直肠肿瘤 外科手术 微创性 Anal canal Rectal neoplasms Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Baig M, et al. Use of transanal minimallyinvasive surgery for endoscopic resection of rectal tumour: atechnical note. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2015, 3(3): 266-267.
  • 2Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J, et al. Robotic transanal totalmesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(11):1047-1053.
  • 3Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, et al. Transanal minimallyinvasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): resultsand experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intentrectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol, 2014,18(5): 473-480.
  • 4Rimonda R, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, et al. TransAnal Minimally InvasiveSurgery (TAMIS) with SILSTM port versus Transanal EndoscopicMicrosurgery (TEM): a comparative experimental study. SurgEndosc, 2013, 27(10): 3762-3768.
  • 5Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, et al. Transanalminimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benignneoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes inthe first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(3): 301-307.
  • 6Silveira Mendes CR, Miranda Ferreira LS, Aguiar Sapucaia R,et al. Transanal minimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS): techniqueand results from an initial experience. J Coloproctol, 2013, 33(4):191-195.
  • 7Hakiman H, Pendola M, Fleshman JW. Replacing TransanalExcision with Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and/or TransanalMinimally Invasive Surgery for Early Rectal Cancer. Clin ColonRectal Surg, 2015, 28(1): 38-42.
  • 8McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, et al. Transanal minimallyinvasive surgery for benig and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am JSurg, 2014, 208(3): 372-381.
  • 9Atallah S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectalexcision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2014, 23(1): 10-16.
  • 10Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasivesurgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24(9): 2200-2205.

同被引文献51

引证文献8

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部