期刊文献+

FOLFOX和FOLFIRI方案用于大肠黏液腺癌辅助化疗的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨FOLFOX及FOLFIRI方案在大肠黏液腺癌术后辅助化疗中的疗效差异。方法 将40例术后病理证实为大肠黏液腺癌患者随机分为2组,实验组应用FOLFIRI方案化疗,对照组应用FOLFOX方案化疗。比较两组的无进展生存时间(progressionfreesurvival,PFS),并应用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存率统计分析。结果 FOLFOX组的中位PFS为13个月,FOLFIRI组的中位PFS为18个月。FOLFIRI方案组PFS比FOLFOX方案组PFS长5个月,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.294,P=0.038)。结论对于大肠黏液腺癌,术后应用FOLFIRI方案化疗比FOLFOX方案可延长PFS。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of FOLFOX regimen and FOLFIRI regimenin the treatment of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma after operation. Methods 40 patients confirmedmucinous adenocarcinoma by surgery and pathology were divided randomly into two groups. Twenty patients(Group FOLFOX) were treated with oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil, while the other Twenty patients(Group FOLFIRI) were treated with irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil. The progression free survival(PFS) of two groups was compared. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results ThePFS of Group FOLFOX is 13 months, while the PFS of Group FOLFIRI is 18 months. Differences arestatistically significant (χ2=4.294, P=0.038). Conclusion Colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma afteroperation treated with FOLFIRI regimen can prolong PFS than FOLFOX regimen.
作者 刘山 孟令新 张可 秦朝阳 王刚平 孟芹 丁兆军 Liu Shan;Meng Lingxin;Zhang Ke;Qin Zhaoyang;Wang Gangping;Meng Qin;Ding Zhaojun(Department of Oncology,Rizhao People′s Hospital, Rizhao 276826, China;Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Rizhao People′s Hospital, Rizhao 276826, China;Department of Pathology, Rizhao People′s Hospital, Rizhao 276826, China)
出处 《中华结直肠疾病电子杂志》 2016年第2期159-162,共4页 Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基金 济宁医学院面上项目(JY2013KY061)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 治疗 粘液腺癌 辅助化疗 Colorectal neoplasms Therapy Mucinous adenocarcinoma Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hyngstrom JR, Hu CY, Xing Y, et al. Clinicopathology and outcomesfor mucinous and signet ring colorectal adenocarcinoma: analysisfrom the National Cancer Data Base.Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(9):2814-2821.
  • 2Hugen N, Verhoeven RH, Radema SA, et al. Prognosis and value ofadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III mucinous colorectal carcinoma.Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(11): 2819-2824.
  • 3Consorti F, Lorenzotti A, Midiri G, et al. Prognostic significance ofmucinous carcinoma of colon and rectum: a prospective case-controlstudy. J Surg Oncol, 2000, 73(2): 70-74.
  • 4Hyngstrom JR, Hu CY, Xing Y, et al. Clinicopathology and outcomesfor mucinous and signet ring colorectal adenocarcinoma: analysisfrom the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(9):2814-2821.
  • 5Jivapaisarnpong P, Boonthongtho K.Clinicopathologicalcharacteristics of mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma inthe colonand rectum in Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand.J Med AssocThai, 2011, 94(Suppl 2): S41-45.
  • 6Barresi V, Reggiani Bonetti L, Ieni A, et al. Prognostic significanceof grading based on the counting of poorly differentiated clustersin colorectalmucinous adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol, 2015, 46(11):1722-1729.
  • 7Zamir N, Ahmed S, Akhtar J. Mucinous adenocarcinoma of colon.APSP J Case Rep, 2010, 1(2): 20.
  • 8Catalano V, Loupakis F, Graziano F, et al. Prognosis of mucinoushistology for patients with radically resected stage II and III coloncancer. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(1): 135-141.
  • 9Kim SH, Shin SJ, Lee KY, et al. Prognostic value of mucinoushistology depends on microsatellite instability status in patients withstage III coloncancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy: aretrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(11): 3407-3413.
  • 10Negri FV, Wotherspoon A, Cunningham D, et al Norman AR.Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsivenessand survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol, 2005, 16(8):1305-1310.

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部