期刊文献+

基于CREAM的航天发射场人因可靠性定量分析方法 被引量:4

Quantitative Analysis Method of Human Reliability in Launching Base Based on CREAM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确得到航天发射场人因失误概率,以我国航天发射场安全评估为背景,基于认知可靠性和失误分析方法,开展航天发射场人因可靠性定量分析方法研究。结合航天发射场特点对共同绩效条件(common performance condition,CPC)进行改进,采用模糊方法处理CPC到控制模式之间的映射关系,提出环境影响因子值的概念,建立航天发射场HRA定量分析流程,并针对火箭吊装过程进行了实例分析。分析结果表明:该方法能够准确计算航天发射场任务作业中的人因失误概率,可为航天发射场人员安全分析提供理论基础和参考。 In order to get the human error probability of the launching base precisely, taken safety evaluation of launching base as background, based on the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM), the launching base human reliability analysis (HRA) was studied in quantify. Firstly, the common performance condition (CPC) is improved in consideration of the launching base. Secondly, the mapping relation from CPC to control model is disposed using a fuzzy method, then the conception of condition effect factor and the HRA flow process of launching base are proposed. Finally,the process of the rocket lifting is analysis as an example. The results show this method can calculates the human error probability of launching base precisely, and also provides theoretical basis and reference for human safety analysis of launching base.
作者 马昕晖 姜曙 尚晨 Ma Xinhui;Jiang Shu;Shang Chen(Department of Space Equipment, Equipment Academy of PLA, Beijing 101416, China;Administrant Brigade of Postgraduate, Equipment Academy of PLA, Beijing 101416, China;No. 92198 Unit of PLA Navy, Huludao 125100, China)
出处 《兵工自动化》 2016年第9期10-16,共7页 Ordnance Industry Automation
关键词 航天发射场 人因可靠性 认知可靠性和失误分析方法 共同绩效条件 launching base human reliability analysis cognitive reliability and error analysis method common performance condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1吴国兴.航天事故中的人为失误分析[J].国际太空,2005(2):18-20. 被引量:3
  • 2王德汉,黄伟芬.载人航天中人的可靠性[J].航天医学与医学工程,1996,9(4):295-301. 被引量:8
  • 3Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysismethod(CREAM)[M]. Elsevier, 1998: 23-33.
  • 4王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:43
  • 5Konstandinidou M, Nivolianitou Z, Kiranoudis C, et al. Afuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology forhuman reliability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering &System Safety, 2006, 91(6): 706-716.
  • 6Yang Z L, Bonsall S, Wall A, et al. A modified CREAM tohuman reliability quantification in marine engineering[J].Ocean Engineering, 2013, 58(4): 293-303.
  • 7He X, Wang Y, Shen Z, et al. A simplified CREAMprospective quantification process and its application[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008, 93(2):298-30.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Stanton N. Human Factors in Nuclear Safety [ M]. London (UK):Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1996.
  • 2Hollnagel E. Reliability analysis and operator modeling [ J ].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996, 52 (3): 327-337.
  • 3Kim I S. Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review [ J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2001, 28(11 ):1069 - 1081.
  • 4Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method [ M].Oxford (UK): Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998.
  • 5Fujita Y, Hollnagel E. Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2004, 83(2): 145 -151.
  • 6Hollnagel E. Human Reliability Analysis [ M]. London ( UK ):Context and Control, Academic Press Ltd, 1993.
  • 7高文宇,张力.人因可靠性分析方法CREAM及其应用研究[J].人类工效学,2002,8(4):8-12. 被引量:22

共引文献51

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部